What does Matthew 12:31-32 mean?
Matthew 12:31-32 warns that speaking against the Holy Spirit is a serious sin that will not be forgiven, while insults against the Son of Man can be forgiven. Jesus says this right after the Pharisees claim his work is from Satan. Early Christian writers like Tatian, Tertullian, Origen, and Cyprian mostly read it as a real warning about an unforgivable sin.
149 early-church witnesses · 226 source quotations · compared with Scripture
What does Matthew 12:31-32 mean?
Matthew 12:31-32 warns that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is not forgiven, while speaking against the Son of Man can be forgiven. In the passage, Jesus is answering the Pharisees after they say his power comes from Beelzebul, so the warning is about hard-hearted rejection of God’s work. Early Christian writers such as Tatian, Tertullian, Origen, and Cyprian quoted this text as a serious warning about a sin that brings no forgiveness.
They usually treated it as a real and lasting judgment, not just a passing insult. Many more early Christian quotations, Bible passages, and source links are gathered below so you can study the evidence for yourself.
Passage context
Jesus says these words after the Pharisees claim he casts out demons by Satan’s power. He first says every sin and blasphemy can be forgiven, but then gives one clear exception: blasphemy against the Spirit. In Mark 3:30, the reason is spelled out: they were saying, “He has an unclean spirit.”
Why early Christian sources matter
Early Christian writers help show how the church closest to the apostles heard this warning. Tatian, Tertullian, Origen, Cyprian, and others read the saying as a real and fearful limit on forgiveness, not a weak figure of speech. Their comments also show that Christians linked the verse to the Spirit’s work, repentance, and the danger of calling God’s work evil.
Common interpretation points
- The main debate is whether this is one specific act or a settled, hardened refusal of the Spirit’s work; the early writers lean toward a serious, lasting rejection.
- Tatian’s Diatessaron preserves the parallel wording in Mark 3:28-30 and Luke 12:10, which helps confirm the meaning of the warning.
- Some later Christian writers connect the passage to repentance, baptism, and church discipline, but the core meaning stays the same: do not blaspheme the Holy Spirit.
Evidence-Based Summary
Matthew 12:31-32 means that Jesus warns people not to call the Spirit’s work evil, because blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, while other sins spoken against the Son of Man can be forgiven. The immediate setting is the Pharisees’ claim that Jesus cast out demons by Beelzebul, so the warning comes in response to a hard-hearted attack on God’s work.
Early Christian writers such as Tatian, Tertullian, Origen, Cyprian, and the Apostolic Constitutions consistently read the passage as a real warning about an unforgivable sin tied to the Holy Spirit. The witness is broad and fairly consistent, though some writers press the point further into later debates about repentance, baptism, and church discipline.
Questions Answered by the Sources
What did early Christians think Matthew 12:31-32 says about blasphemy against the Holy Spirit?
They treated it as a real and serious warning. Tertullian, Origen, Cyprian, Novatian, Victorinus, and Irenaeus quote or explain the saying as a sin that is not forgiven. The early evidence does not soften the warning into a harmless figure of speech.
-
Tertullian, Against Marcion Direct teaching
but whosoever shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him.
-
Origen, De Principiis (On First Principles) Direct teaching
but that he who is guilty of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit has not forgiveness, either in the present world or in that which is to come!
-
Cyprian, Epistles Direct teaching
but he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost shall not have forgiveness, but is guilty of eternal sin.
-
Novatian, Treatise Concerning the Trinity Direct teaching
Whosoever shall blaspheme against Him, has not forgiveness, not only in this world, but also not in the world to come.
-
Victorinus, Commentary on the Apocalypse Direct teaching
Whosoever shall blaspheme against Him, has not forgiveness, not only in this world, but also not in the world to come.
-
Origen, De Principiis (On First Principles) Direct teaching
whereas he who has been deemed worthy to have a portion of the Holy Spirit, and who has relapsed, is, by this very act and work, said to be guilty of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.
-
Origen, Commentary on John Supporting witness
...in the Gospel He declares that there is forgiveness for sin committed against Himself, but that for blasphemy against the Holy Spirit there is no forgiveness, either in this age or in the age to come. What is the reason for this? Is it because the Holy Spirit is of greater value than Christ, so that sin against Him cannot be forgiven? Or may it rather be that all rational beings have a part in Christ, and that forgiveness is extended to them when they repent of their sins, while only those have a part in the Holy Spirit who have been found worthy of it? Then there can hardly be any forgiveness for those who fall away into evil in spite of such great and powerful cooperation, and who defeat the counsels of the Spirit who is in them. When we find the Lord saying, as He does in Isaiah, that He is sent by the Father and by His Spirit, we must point out here also that the Spirit is not originally superior to the Savior. Rather, the Savior takes a lower place than He in order to carry out the divine arrangement that the Son of God should become man. If anyone stumbles at our saying that the Savior, in becoming man, was made lower than the Holy Spirit, we ask him to consider the words
-
Irenaeus, Against Heresies: Book III Supporting witness
...omen prophesying in the Church. Sinning in these matters against the Spirit of God, they commit the unforgivable sin. Meanwhile, those from Valentinus are utterly reckless, boasting that they have more Gospels than exist while presenting their own writings. They're so audacious that they call their recent work "the Gospel of Truth," although it bears no resemblance to the Apostolic Gospels, making their Gospel full of blasphemy. For if what they've published is the Gospel of Truth, yet completely differs from what the apostles handed down, it's clear, as the Scriptures themselves affirm, that what is handed down from the apostles should no longer be deemed the Gospel of Truth. But these Gospels alone are true and reliable, allowing neither an increase nor decrease in their number, as I have proven through numerous arguments. Since God created everything in proportion and harmony, it was also fitting for the outward appearance of the Gospel to be well-organized and consistent. Therefore, having examined the views of those who passed the Gospel down to us, from their very origins, let us also proceed to consider the remaining apostles and investigate their teachings regarding God;
-
Matthew 12:31 Direct teaching
Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven people, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.
-
Matthew 12:32 Direct teaching
Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come.
-
Mark 3:29 Direct teaching
but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin”—
-
Mark 3:30 Background
because they said, “He has an unclean spirit.”
More related quotations from this section 13 shown
-
Origen, De Principiis (On First Principles) Direct teaching
...ly Ghost coming upon you.” For this reason also, I think it follows that he who has committed a sin against the Son of Man deserves forgiveness. For if someone who shares in the word or reason of God stops living in agreement with reason, he seems to have fallen into a state of ignorance or folly, and therefore to deserve forgiveness. But he who has been deemed worthy to have a portion of the Holy Spirit, and has relapsed, is by this very act and deed said to be guilty of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. Let no one suppose that because we have said that the Holy Spirit is conferred only upon the saints, while the benefits or operations of the Father and of the Son extend to good and bad, to just and unjust, we are therefore giving preference to the Holy Spirit over the Father and the Son, or saying that His dignity is greater. That certainly would be a very illogical conclusion. For we have been describing what is distinctive about His grace and operations. Moreover, nothing in the Trinity can be called greater or less, since the fountain of divinity alone contains all things by His word and reason, and by the Spirit of His mouth sanctifies all things that are worthy of sancti
-
Novatian, Treatise Concerning the Trinity Supporting witness
...lled gods, much more is He God who is found to be above them all. And yet He answered the charge of blasphemy in a fitting way and with lawful tact. For He wished to be understood as God in this way, as the Son of God, and He did not wish to be understood as the Father Himself. So He said that He was sent, and showed them that He had shown many good works from the Father. From this He wished them to understand that He was not the Father, but the Son. And in the later part of His defense He mentioned the Son, not the Father, when He said, "You say, 'You blaspheme,' because I said, 'I am the Son of God.'" Thus, as far as the charge of blasphemy is concerned, He calls Himself the Son, not the Father. But as to His divinity, by saying, "I and the Father are one," He proved that He is the Son of God. Therefore He is God, but God in such a way as to be the Son, not the Father.
-
Victorinus, Commentary on the Apocalypse Supporting witness
... more is He God who is found to be above all these. And nevertheless He refuted the false charge of blasphemy in a fitting manner and with lawful tact. For He wishes to be understood as God in this way, as the Son of God, and He would not wish to be understood as the Father Himself. Thus He said that He was sent, and showed them that He had displayed many good works from the Father. From this He desired that He should not be understood to be the Father, but the Son. And in the later part of His defense He made mention of the Son, not the Father, when He said, “You say, ‘You blaspheme,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God.’” Thus, as far as the guilt of blasphemy is concerned, He calls Himself the Son, not the Father. But as it pertains to His divinity, by saying, “I and the Father are one,” He proved that He was the Son of God. He is God, therefore, but God in such a manner as to be the Son, not the Father.
-
Matthew 12:33 Background
“Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad, for the tree is known by its fruit.
-
Matthew 12:37 Background
For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.
-
Matthew 12:36 Background
But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
-
Hebrews 10:18 Background
Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.
-
Apostolic Constitutions, Apostolic Constitutions Background
... a careful feeder of the flock, search out your flock and keep account of it. Seek what is missing. Matthew 18:12 For the Lord God, our gracious Father, sent His own Son, the good Shepherd and Saviour, our Master Jesus, and commanded Him to leave the ninety-nine on the mountains and to go search for the one that was lost. And when He found it, He was to place it on His shoulders and carry it into the flock, rejoicing that He had found what was lost. In the same way, be obedient, O bishop, and seek what was lost. Guide what has wandered out of the right way. Bring back what has gone astray. For you have authority to bring them back and to deliver those who are broken-hearted by remission. For through you our Saviour says to the one discouraged by the sense of his sins, “Your sins are forgiven you; your faith has saved you; go in peace.” But this peace and haven of tranquillity is the Church of Christ. When you have loosed them from their sins, restore them to it, since they are now sound and blameless, full of good hope, diligent, and laborious in good works. Like a skillful and compassionate physician, heal all who have wandered in the ways of sin. For those who are whole have n
-
Apostolic Constitutions, Apostolic Constitutions Background
Therefore, bishop, let your care reach every kind of person: those who have not sinned, so that they may remain innocent; and those who do sin, so that they may repent. For the Lord says this to you: "Take heed that you do not offend one of these little ones" in Matthew 18:10. It is also your duty to grant forgiveness to those who repent. For as soon as someone who has sinned says with sincere heart, "I have sinned against the Lord," the Holy Spirit answers, "The Lord also has forgiven your sin; be of good cheer, you shall not die." Therefore, bishop, understand the dignity of your office. As you have received the power of binding, so you have also received the power of loosing. Since you have the power of loosing, know yourself, and conduct yourself in this world in a way that fits your office, knowing that you must give a great account. For to those whom, as the Scripture says, men have entrusted much, they will require the more, in Luke 12:48. For no man is free from sin, except Him who was made man for us. For it is written, "No man is pure from filthiness, no, not even if his life is only one day long." For this reason, the lives and conduct of the ancient holy men and patriar
-
Cyprian, Epistles Background
...ame of Christ is presented in the Gospels and in the letters of the apostles for the forgiveness of sins, it is not presented in such a way that the Son alone, without the Father or against the Father, can help anyone. Rather, it was to show the Jews, who boasted that they had the Father, that the Father would benefit them nothing unless they believed in the Son whom He had sent. For those who know God the Father, the Creator, ought also to know Christ the Son, so that they may not flatter and praise themselves about the Father alone without acknowledging His Son, who also said, "No man comes to the Father but by me." John 14:6 But He, the same one, also shows that it is the knowledge of both that saves, when He says, "And this is eternal life, that they might know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent." John 17:3 Since, therefore, by the preaching and testimony of Christ Himself, the Father who sent must first be known, and afterward Christ, who was sent, and there can be no hope of salvation except by knowing the two together, how can those among the heretics, who are said to be baptized in the name of Christ, be judged to have obtained the forgiveness o
-
Tatian, The Diatessaron Background
But when the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all his pure angels with him, then he will sit on the throne of his glory. He will gather all the nations before him and separate them from one another, like a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will set the sheep on his right, and the goats on his left. Then the King will say to those on his right, “Come, you blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you took me in. I was naked, and you clothed me. I was sick, and you visited me. I was in prison, and you cared for me.” Then the righteous will say to him, “Our Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink? When did we see you a stranger and take you in, or naked and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and care for you?” The King will answer and say to them, “Truly I say to you, whatever you did to one of these my brothers, the little ones, you did to me.” Then he will also say to those on his left, “Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his host
-
Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho Background
... by Him if they do anything against right reason. We, both men and angels, will be proven guilty of sin unless we repent beforehand. If the word of God predicts that some angels and people will definitely be punished, it is because it foreknows they will be unchangeably wicked, not because God made them that way. Therefore, if they repent, all who desire it can receive mercy from God: and Scripture declares that they will be blessed, saying, 'Blessed is the man to whom the Lord does not impute sin;' meaning, after he has repented of his sins so that he may receive forgiveness from God. Not like some of you deceive yourselves, and others like you, by saying that even as sinners, knowing God will mean that the Lord will not charge them with sin. We have evidence in the single failing of David, which occurred due to his pride, and he was forgiven when he mourned and wept, as it is written. If even such a man was not granted forgiveness without repentance, and only after this great king, anointed one, and prophet mourned and humbled himself, how can those who are impure and utterly lost, expect that the Lord will not count their sin if they do not weep, mourn, and repent? This one f
-
Irenaeus, Against Heresies: Book III Background
...ilarly, he wouldn't have so readily given them baptism if he hadn't heard them prophesying when the Holy Ghost rested upon them. So, he exclaimed, "Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized, who have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?" He persuaded those with him, pointing out that unless the Holy Ghost had rested upon them, there might have been someone who would have raised objections to their baptism. The apostles with James allowed the Gentiles to act freely, yielding us to the Spirit of God. However, they themselves, while knowing the same God, continued in the ancient observances. So, even Peter, fearing possible reproof from them, although he formerly ate with the Gentiles because of the vision and the Spirit who had rested upon them, withdrew and didn't eat with them when certain persons came from James. Paul said Barnabas did the same. Thus, the apostles, whom the Lord made witnesses of every action and doctrine—for we frequently find Peter, James, and John present with Him—carefully acted according to the dispensation of the Mosaic law, showing that it was from one and the same God. They certainly would not have done this, as I have already mention
Did early Christians distinguish speaking against the Son of Man from blaspheming the Holy Spirit?
Yes. Tatian preserves the line that a word against the Son of Man can be forgiven, while Origen and Tertullian discuss the contrast with blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. The point is not that insulting Christ is safe, but that Jesus marks blasphemy against the Spirit as uniquely grave.
-
Origen, De Principiis (On First Principles) Supporting witness
Who, then, is not amazed at the exceeding majesty of the Holy Spirit, when he hears that he who speaks a word against the Son of man may hope for forgiveness;
-
Tatian, The Diatessaron Supporting witness
Matthew 12:32 And he said also, Every one that speaks a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him;
-
Tertullian, Against Marcion Supporting witness
...he Creator’s hell. After warning His disciples against denying Him, He adds a warning about fearing blasphemy: “Whoever shall speak against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him; but whoever shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him,” Luke 12:10. Now, if both the remission and the retention of sin belong to a God who judges, then the Holy Ghost, who must not be blasphemed, belongs to Him who will not forgive the blasphemy; just as, in the previous passage, He who was not to be denied belonged to Him who, after He had killed, also casts into hell. Now, since it is Christ who turns blasphemy away from the Creator, I do not know how His adversary could have come. Otherwise, if by these sayings He throws a dark cloud of blame over the severity of Him who will not forgive blasphemy and will kill even to hell, then it follows that the very spirit of that rival god may be blasphemed without punishment, and his Christ denied. It would mean, in fact, that there is no difference between worshipping him and despising him. And since there is no punishment for contempt, there is also no reward for the worship that men should expect. When they are brought before magi
-
Origen, Commentary on John Supporting witness
Now the Lord has sent Me, He says, Isaiah 48:16 and His Spirit, and in the Gospel He declares that there is forgiveness for the sin committed against Himself, but that for blasphemy against the Holy Spirit there is no forgiveness, either in this age or in the age to come.
-
Luke 12:10 Direct teaching
And everyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but the one who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.
-
Mark 3:28 Direct teaching
Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme:
Did early Christians connect this warning with eternal sin?
Yes. Cyprian and Tatian preserve language about eternal sin and no forgiveness, while Irenaeus applies the idea to sinning against the Spirit of God. The Didache also echoes the warning that this sin is not forgiven, though its context is church discernment of prophets.
-
Irenaeus, Against Heresies: Book III Direct teaching
Sinning, therefore, in all these particulars, against the Spirit of God, they fall into the irremissible sin.
-
Tatian, The Diatessaron Supporting witness
56] that all sins and blasphemies with which men blaspheme shall be forgiven 29 them: but whosoever shall blaspheme against the Holy Spirit, there is no 30 forgiveness for him for ever, but he is deserving of eternal punishment: Mark 3:30 because they 31 said that he had an unclean spirit.
-
Cyprian, Epistles Supporting witness
An execrable and detestable thing is actually asserted by some, that He who threatens the man who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit, that he shall be guilty of eternal sin, Himself condescends to sanctify those who blaspheme against God the Father with saving baptism.
-
Didache, Connection to Mark 3:29 Supporting witness
And every prophet that speaketh in the Spirit ye shall neither try nor judge; for every sin shall be forgiven, but this sin shall not be forgiven.
-
Hebrews 10:29 Background
Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing, and insulted the Spirit of grace?
Common Questions
What sin does Jesus say will not be forgiven in Matthew 12:31-32?
He says blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, even though other sins and blasphemies can be forgiven.
Why did Jesus say this in Matthew 12:31-32?
He said it after the Pharisees claimed his power came from Beelzebul, which Mark says was because they said, “He has an unclean spirit.”
How did early Christians understand Matthew 12:31-32?
They usually understood it as a real warning that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit brings no forgiveness, as shown in Tatian, Tertullian, Origen, and Cyprian.
Source Index for Matthew 12:31-32
The guided sections above show the strongest quotations. This compact index highlights 157 ranked source links from 226 compiled sources for deeper study.
Source index 157 ranked links shown
Early Christian Writings 80 shown of 149
Primary-source quotations from early Christian writers and church documents.
Bible Passages 77 included
Related Bible passages saved for comparison with the early Christian quotations.
Related Resources
Course Lesson
Apostolic Foundations Journey of the Chosen Twelve Matthew Chapter 10 – Part 1
Open a related course lesson for more teaching connected with Matthew 12:31-32.
Course Lesson
Beyond the Letter the Spirit of the Law Matthew Chapter 5 – Part 2
Open a related course lesson for more teaching connected with Matthew 12:31-32.
Course Lesson
Did the Early Church Talk About Matthew 517 18 Jot or Tiddle
Open a related course lesson for more teaching connected with Matthew 12:31-32.
Site Page
Matthew 10:34-39
Compare another early Christian topic page with related source quotations.
Site Page
Matthew 11:25-30
Compare another early Christian topic page with related source quotations.
Site Page
Matthew 13:1-23
Compare another early Christian topic page with related source quotations.