Romans 1:18-32 Meaning
Romans 1:18-32 says that when people reject God’s truth, he gives them over to the path they chose, and that leads to deep sin and shame. The passage links idolatry, broken thinking, and moral collapse. Early Christian writers like Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Irenaeus, and Theophilus of Antioch read it as a serious warning about sin, truth, and God’s just judgment.
147 early-church witnesses · 255 source quotations · compared with Scripture
What does Romans 1:18-32 mean?
Romans 1:18-32 means that God’s anger is revealed against sin because people know enough about him to honor him, but they suppress the truth and turn to evil. Paul says this rejection leads to darkened thinking, dishonorable desires, and a life marked by unrighteous acts. Early Christian writers like Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Hippolytus, Origen, Irenaeus, and Theophilus of Antioch used this passage to teach that God’s judgment is real and that sin brings its own ruin.
Many more early Christian quotations, Bible passages, and source links are gathered below so you can study the evidence for yourself.
Passage context
Paul is beginning his case that all people need the gospel. In the verses right before this section, he says the gospel reveals God’s righteousness through faith. In the verses after it, he turns to judgment and makes clear that no one can claim innocence before God.
Why early Christian sources matter
Early Christian writers help show how the first readers of Romans understood this passage. Tertullian especially tied the text to the Creator’s just wrath, while Clement, Origen, Irenaeus, and Theophilus used it to warn against false worship and immoral living. Their comments show that the church read Romans 1 as a sober lesson about truth, judgment, and the results of turning away from God.
Common interpretation points
- The passage is not mainly about one isolated sin; it is about a whole pattern of rejecting God and being given over to sin.
- Several early writers apply the passage to God’s just judgment, but they do not all focus on the same details.
- The clearest shared theme is the link between false worship, darkened minds, and shameful actions.
Evidence-Based Summary
Romans 1:18-32 teaches that people are under God’s anger when they suppress the truth, refuse to honor him, and give themselves over to sinful desires. It also says that when people turn from God, he gives them over to the path they have chosen, leading to moral and social breakdown. Early Christian writers such as Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Hippolytus, Theophilus of Antioch, Origen, and Irenaeus used this passage to argue that one God judges sin and that God’s wrath is real and just.
The witness is broad and early, though some cards lean more on the first half of the passage’s judgment theme than on every detail of the list of sins. The strongest shared reading is that Paul is warning that rejecting God leads to both inward ruin and outward evil.
Key Takeaways
- Romans 1:18-32 teaches that rejecting God leads to dark thinking, shameful desires, and real judgment.
- Early Christians commonly read the passage as a warning about God’s just wrath, not as a minor moral lesson.
- Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Irenaeus, and Theophilus all connect the passage to sin, truth, and judgment.
Questions Answered by the Sources
Did early Christians think Romans 1:18-32 teaches God’s real wrath against sin?
Yes. Early Christians read Romans 1:18-32 as a real warning that God’s wrath is revealed against sin and that judgment is tied to truth. Tertullian, Irenaeus, Origen, and Theophilus connect the passage to God’s just anger and the punishment of those who reject the truth.
-
Romans 1:18 Direct teaching
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,
-
Tertullian, Against Marcion Direct teaching
... first, and also to the Greek; for in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith," Romans 1:16-17, he undoubtedly ascribes both the gospel and salvation to Him whom, according to our heretic's own distinction, I have called the just God, not the good one. It is He who removes men from confidence in the law to faith in the gospel. That is, to His own law and His own gospel. When, again, he declares that "the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness," Romans 1:18, I ask, the wrath of what God? Certainly of the Creator. Therefore the truth will be His, whose also is the wrath that has to be revealed to avenge the truth. Likewise, when adding, "We are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth," Romans 2:2, he both vindicated that wrath from which this judgment for the truth comes, and at the same time gave another proof that the truth comes from the same God whose wrath he affirmed, by bearing witness to His judgment. Marcion's claim is quite a different matter: that the Creator in anger avenges Himself on the truth of the rival god, which had been kept in unrighteousness
-
Tertullian, Against Marcion Direct teaching
When, again, he declares that the wrath (of God) is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness, Romans 1:18 (I ask) the wrath of what God?
-
Tertullian, Against Marcion Supporting witness
Romans 1:18 so that this sentence, which is quite in accordance with that previous one wherein the judgment is declared to be the Creator's, cannot possibly be ascribed to another god who is not a judge, and is incapable of wrath.
-
Tertullian, Against Marcion Supporting witness
Likewise, when adding, We are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth, Romans 2:2 he both vindicated that wrath from which comes this judgment for the truth, and at the same time afforded another proof that the truth emanates from the same God whose wrath he attested, by witnessing to His judgment.
-
Tertullian, Against Marcion Supporting witness
Romans 2:2 The wrath, therefore, which is to vindicate truth, can only be revealed from heaven by the God of wrath;
-
Irenaeus, Against Heresies: Book IV Supporting witness
so also is it the case at present, that “a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.” And as the wrath of God did then descend upon the unrighteous, here also does the apostle likewise say: “For the wrath of God shall be revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of those men who hold back the truth in unrighteousness.” And as, in those times, vengeance came from God upon the Egyptians who were subjecting Israel to unjust punishment, so is it now, the Lord truly declaring, “And shall not God avenge His own elect, which cry day and night unto Him?
-
Irenaeus, Against Heresies: Book IV Supporting witness
...son." The apostle also says, "Let no one deceive you with empty words; because of these things, the wrath of God comes upon the sons of mistrust. Do not partake with them." Just as then the condemnation of sinners extended to others who approved of them and joined their company, it is also now the case that "a little leaven leavens the whole lump." As the wrath of God descended upon the unrighteous then, the apostle also says: "For the wrath of God shall be revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of those who suppress the truth in unrighteousness." Just as, in those times, God's vengeance came upon the Egyptians who subjected Israel to unjust punishment, it is similar now, as the Lord truly declares, "And shall not God avenge His own elect, who cry to Him day and night? I tell you, He will avenge them speedily." The apostle also says similarly in the Epistle to the Thessalonians: "Since it is a righteous thing with God to repay tribulation to those who trouble you; and to you who are troubled, rest with us at the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ from heaven with His mighty angels, in a flame of fire, taking vengeance on those who do not know God and t
-
Hippolytus, Treatise on Christ and Antichrist Supporting witness
And Paul in like manner: For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth of God in unrighteousness.
-
Origen, Against Celsus Supporting witness
For respecting such Paul says in express words: The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
-
Theophilus of Antioch, To Autolycus Supporting witness
1 Corinthians 2:9 But to the unbelieving and despisers, who obey not the truth, but are obedient to unrighteousness, when they shall have been filled with adulteries and fornications, and filthiness, and covetousness, and unlawful idolatries, there shall be anger and wrath, tribulation and anguish, Romans 2:8-9 and at the last everlasting fire shall possess such men.
-
Theophilus of Antioch, Connection to Romans 2:8 Supporting witness
To the unbelieving and despisers who obey not the truth but unrighteousness, when they have been filled with adulteries, and fornications and filthiness, and covetousness and unlawful idolatries, there shall be anger and wrath, tribulation and anguish, and at the last everlasting fire shall possess them.
More related quotations from this section 5 shown
-
Lactantius, On the Anger of God Supporting witness
And at some time, God no longer soothing His anger, but increasing it, and destroying the race of men, and laying waste the whole of it by fire.
-
Lactantius, On the Anger of God Supporting witness
Since great anger is coming upon a disobedient world, I disclose the commands of God to the last age, prophesying to all men from city to city.
-
Cyprian, Treatises Supporting witness
and that as the day of judgment is now drawing near, the censure of an indignant God should be more and more aroused for the scourging of the human race.
-
Anonymous, Treatise Against the Heretic Novatian Background
...cks, ‘Fall upon us, and hide us from the sight of the Father who sits upon the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb. Because the day of destruction comes, and who shall be able to stand?’” Revelation 6:12-17 Also in the same Apocalypse John says that this too was revealed to him: “I saw a great throne, and one in white who sat upon it, from whose face heaven and earth fled away; and their place was not found. And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the sight of the Lord’s throne. And the books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of life. And every one was judged according to those things that were written in the book, according to their own works.” Revelation 20:11-13 Moreover, the apostle also, giving good advice, thus exhorts us, saying, “Let no one deceive you with vain words. For because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the children of disobedience. Do not be partakers with them.” Ephesians 5:6-7
-
Victorinus, Connection to Revelation 15:1 Background
"And I saw another great and wonderful sign, seven angels having the seven last plagues; for in them is completed the indignation of God." For the wrath of God always strikes the obstinate people with seven plagues, that is, perfectly, as it is said in Leviticus; and these shall be in the last time, when the Church shall have gone out of the midst.
What did early Christians say about God giving people over to sin in Romans 1?
They understood it as God allowing stubborn sinners to follow the path they chose, which then led to deeper corruption. Clement, Hippolytus, Origen, and Lactantius all use this kind of language to describe moral collapse after people turn away from God.
-
Romans 1:28 Direct teaching
And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.
-
Romans 1:24 Direct teaching
Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves,
-
Origen, Against Celsus Supporting witness
But since those who wandered away from the east were delivered over, on account of their sins, to a reprobate mind, and to vile affections, and to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, in order that, being sated with sin, they might hate it, we shall refuse our assent to the assertion of Celsus, that because of the superintending spirits distributed among the different parts of the earth, what is done among each nation is rightly done;
-
Origen, Against Celsus Supporting witness
...dered away from the east were delivered over, on account of their sins, to a reprobate mind, and to vile affections, and to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, in order that, being sated with sin, they might hate it, we refuse our assent to the assertion of Celsus that, because of the superintending spirits distributed among the different parts of the earth, what is done among each nation is rightly done. For our desire is to do what is not agreeable to these spirits. For we see that it is a religious act to do away with the customs originally established in the various places by means of laws of a better and more divine character, which were enacted by Jesus, as one possessed of the greatest power, who has rescued us from the present evil world and from the princes of the world that come to nothing. And we see that it is a mark of irreligion not to throw ourselves at the feet of Him who has manifested Himself to be holier and more powerful than all other rulers, and to whom God said, as the prophets had predicted many generations before: "Ask of Me, and I shall give You the heathen for Your inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for Your possession." F
-
Origen, Against Celsus Background
We do speak of the wrath of God. However, we do not mean that this indicates any passion in Him. Rather, it is something assumed in order to discipline, by stern means, those sinners who have committed many serious sins. For what is called God’s wrath and anger is a means of discipline. That this understanding agrees with Scripture is clear from what is said in Psalm 6: “O Lord, rebuke me not in Your anger, neither chasten me in Your hot displeasure;” and also in Jeremiah: “O Lord, correct me, but with judgment; not in Your anger, lest You bring me to nothing.” Moreover, anyone who reads in the second book of Kings about the wrath of God leading David to number the people, and finds in the first book of Chronicles that it was the devil who suggested this action, will easily see, by comparing the two statements, for what purpose wrath is mentioned. Of this wrath, as the Apostle Paul declares, all men are children: “We were by nature children of wrath, even as others.” Further, that wrath is not a passion on God’s part, but that each person brings it on himself by his sins, is clear from another statement of Paul: “Or do you despise the riches of His goodness, and forbearance, and lo
-
Lactantius, The Divine Institutes Supporting witness
...able to receive virtue, just as the earth can be cultivated. He placed the material of vices in the affections, and the material of virtue in vices. For virtue certainly would not exist, or would not be active, if the things were missing by which its power is either shown or exercised. Now let us see what those men have accomplished who completely remove vices. They speak about four affections, which they think arise from judging things to be good or evil. By rooting these out, they think the mind of the wise man will be healed. But since they understand that these affections are planted by nature, and that without them nothing can be moved and nothing can be done, they put certain other things in their place instead. For desire they substitute inclination, as though it were not much better to desire a good thing than merely to feel inclined toward it. In the same way, they substitute gladness for joy, and caution for fear. But in the case of the fourth, they cannot find a way to exchange the name. Therefore they have completely taken away grief, that is, sadness and pain of mind, though this cannot possibly be done. For who can help being grieved if a plague has laid waste his
-
Lactantius, The Divine Institutes Supporting witness
...ng that there should be no vices at all. For nothing is born vicious. But if we make bad use of the affections, they become vices; if we use them well, they become virtues. So it must be shown that the causes of the affections, and not the affections themselves, must be moderated. They say that we should not rejoice with excessive joy, but moderately and calmly. This is as if they were saying that we should not run fast, but walk quietly. But it is possible for the one who walks to go astray, and for the one who runs to keep to the right path. What if I show that there is a case in which it is wrong not only to rejoice moderately, but even to rejoice in the smallest degree, and that there is another case, on the contrary, in which it is not at all wrong to exult with overflowing joy? Then what benefit, I ask, will this moderation give us? I ask whether they think that a wise man ought to rejoice if he sees some evil happening to his enemy, or whether he ought to restrain his joy if, by the conquest of enemies or the overthrow of a tyrant, liberty and safety have been gained for his fellow citizens.
-
Lactantius, On the Anger of God Background
...uences. Because, when one affection was removed, necessity itself compelled him to remove the other affections also from God. Thus, he who is not subject to anger is plainly not influenced by kindness, which is the opposite feeling to anger. Now if there is neither anger nor kindness in Him, it is clear that there is neither fear, nor joy, nor grief, nor pity. For all the affections belong together and move together, and this cannot be the case with God. But if there is no affection in God, because whatever is subject to affections is weak, it follows that there is in Him neither care for anything, nor providence.
-
Didache, Connection to Romans 1:28 Supporting witness
whom God for their perverseness "delivered over to foolishness, to do those things that are not convenient!"
How did early Christians read Romans 1:26-27 about natural relations?
They took these verses as a clear warning about turning from the natural order into shameful passions. Clement of Alexandria and Hippolytus quote the passage directly, and other writers use it when speaking against sexual sin and moral disorder.
-
Romans 1:26 Direct teaching
For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature;
-
Romans 1:27 Direct teaching
and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.
-
Clement of Alexandria, The Instructor (Paedagogus) Direct teaching
...four-footed animals, and try to sow children. But God gave the ungodly over, as the Apostle says in Romans 1:26-27, to shameful passions: "For even their women exchanged the natural use for that which is against nature. Likewise also their men, leaving the natural use, burned in their desire for one another, men with men doing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the due reward of their error." Yet nature has not allowed even the most lustful animals to put seed into the passage of excrement. For urine is discharged into the bladder, softened food into the belly, tears into the eye, blood into the veins, dirt into the ears, and mucus is carried into the nostrils. But at the end of the rectum the seat is joined, through which excrement is expelled. So only the unusual nature found in hyenas devised this extra part for excessive intercourse. For that reason it is also somewhat hollow for a short distance, so that it may serve itching parts. But after that, the hollow closes up. For it was not made for generation. From this it is clear to us, and openly admitted, that intercourse with males must be avoided, and fruitless sowings, and preposterous Venus, and the unions of a
-
Hippolytus, Refutation of All Heresies Direct teaching
...ble man, and birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things. Therefore God also gave them up to vile affections; for even their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature." What the natural use is, according to them, we will explain later. "And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust toward one another; men with men doing what is unseemly"—now the expression "what is unseemly" means, according to these Naasseni, the first and blessed substance, without form, the cause of all forms in the things that are shaped—"and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was fitting." Romans 1:20-27. For they say that in these words spoken by Paul, their whole secret is contained, and a hidden mystery of blessed pleasure. For the promise of washing is, according to them, nothing other than the bringing in of the one who is washed into life-giving water, and anointed with ineffable ointment, into unfading bliss.
-
Hippolytus, Refutation of All Heresies Supporting witness
And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another;
-
Clement of Alexandria, The Instructor (Paedagogus) Supporting witness
quocirca fiunt eis superfetationes. A vehementibus ergo appetitionibus, mutuisque congressionibus, et cure prægnantibus feminis conjunctionibus, alternisque initibus, puerorumque stupris, adulteriis et libidine abstinere, hujus nos ænigmatis adhortata est prohibitio.
-
Arnobius, Against the Heathen Background
What, then, now remains, but to believe that they, as unclean beasts, are transported with violent passions, rush with maddened desires into mutual embraces, and at last, with shattered and ruined bodies, are enfeebled by their sensuality?
-
Arnobius, Against the Heathen Background
Some of them are brought forward in the character of lovers, destroyers of purity, to commit shameful and degrading deeds not only with women, but with men also.
-
Lactantius, The Divine Institutes Background
For they ought truly to be accounted as leprous and unclean, whom either boundless lusts compel to crimes, or insatiable pleasures to disgraceful deeds, and affect with an everlasting stain those who are branded with the marks of dishonourable actions.
Did early Christians connect Romans 1:29-32 to pride, envy, deceit, and approval of evil?
Yes. Early Christians often repeated the vice list from Romans 1 and especially the last line about people who not only do evil but approve it. Clement of Rome, Barnabas, Cyprian, and the Apostolic Constitutions all echo that moral warning.
-
Romans 1:29 Direct teaching
They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips,
-
Romans 1:30 Direct teaching
backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
-
Romans 1:31 Direct teaching
Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
-
Romans 1:32 Direct teaching
Though they know God's decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.
-
Cyprian, Connection to Romans 1:30 Direct teaching
"Whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, injurious, proud, boasters of themselves, inventors of evil things, who, although they knew the judgment of God, did not understand that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only they which commit those things, but they also which consent unto those who do these things."
-
Clement of Rome, Connection to Romans 1:32 Direct teaching
Those who do such things are hateful to God—and not only those who do them but those who take pleasure in those who do them.
-
Barnabas, Connection to Romans 1:29 Supporting witness
In it are murderers, and corrupters of God's moulded work, and they that go away from the right track, and judges of evil: those that are double-minded... persecutors of the good, hating truth, loving a lie.
-
Didache, The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles Supporting witness
persecutors of the good, hating truth, loving a lie, not knowing a reward for righteousness, not cleaving to good nor to righteous judgment, watching not for that which is good, but for that which is evil;
-
Apostolic Constitutions, Apostolic Constitutions Supporting witness
For they who do such things do not adhere to goodness, or to righteous judgment: they watch not for good, but for evil;
-
Clement of Rome, First Epistle to the Corinthians Supporting witness
and if we follow the way of truth, casting away from us all unrighteousness and iniquity, along with all covetousness, strife, evil practices, deceit, whispering, and evil-speaking, all hatred of God, pride and haughtiness, vainglory and ambition.
-
Anonymous, Connection to Romans 1:32 Supporting witness
And therefore the laws not only of the Church, but of the world, condemn those who are guilty of this crime; and not only those indeed who actually conspire, but those also who take part with such.
-
Anonymous, Connection to Romans 1:32 Supporting witness
because, according to the apostle, not only those who commit such things are condemned, but also those who consent with those who do them.
More related quotations from this section 5 shown
-
Apostolic Constitutions, Apostolic Constitutions Background
Matthew 5:11-12 If, therefore, any one be slandered and falsely accused, such a one is blessed;
-
Apostolic Constitutions, Apostolic Constitutions Background
...e is slandered and falsely accused, such a person is blessed. For the Scripture says, “A man who is reprobate is not tried by God.” But if anyone is convicted of having done a wicked act, such a person not only harms himself, but also causes the whole body of the Church and its teaching to be blasphemed, as though we Christians do not practice the things that we declare to be good and honest. And we ourselves will be reproached by the Lord: “They say, and do not do.” Matthew 23:3 Therefore the bishop must boldly reject such people after full conviction, unless they change their way of life.
-
Tertullian, Apology Background
...have answered well enough the charges of the many crimes on which these fierce demands are made for Christian blood. We have fully presented our case. We have shown how we can prove that what we say is true, from the trustworthiness and antiquity of our sacred writings, and also from the confession of the powers of spiritual wickedness themselves. Who will dare to refute us, not with skill in words, but, as we have made our demonstration, on the basis of reality? But while the truth we hold is made clear to all, unbelief meanwhile, even at the very time when it is convinced of the worth of Christianity, now well known both for its benefits and from the intercourse of life, takes up the idea that it is not really something divine, but rather a kind of philosophy. "These are the very things," it says, "that the philosophers advise and profess: innocence, justice, patience, sobriety, and chastity." Why then are we not allowed the same freedom and immunity for our teachings that they have, when we are compared with them in what we teach? Or why are they not also forced to the same acts, by refusing which our lives are put in danger, if they are so much like us? For who forces a phil
-
Minucius Felix, Octavius Background
...xtreme suffering for his wickedness, and to the deadly wood of the cross, assigns fitting altars to reprobate and wicked men, so that they may worship what they deserve. Now the story about the initiation of young novices is as detestable as it is well known. An infant, covered with meal so that it may deceive the unwary, is placed before the one who is about to be stained by their rites. This infant is killed by the young pupil, who has been urged on, as if to harmless blows on the surface of the meal, with dark and secret wounds. Thirstily—O horror!—they lick up its blood. Eagerly they divide its limbs. By this victim they are bound together. By this consciousness of wickedness they are pledged to mutual silence. Sacred rites like these are more foul than any sacrileges. And it is well known that all men speak everywhere of their feasting. Even the speech of our Cirtensian bears witness to it. On a solemn day they gather at the banquet, with all their children, sisters, mothers, people of every sex and every age. There, after much feasting, when the company has grown warm, and the heat of incestuous lust has grown hot with drunkenness, a dog tied to the chandelier is provoked,
-
Hippolytus, Exegetical Fragments Background
...ed in wickedness. The apostle also says, "Rebuke those who sin before all"; that is, all except the reprobate. And who is meant by the conies except us ourselves? For we once were like hogs, living in all the filth of the world. But now, because we believe in Christ, we build our houses on the holy flesh of Christ as on a rock.
Common Questions
Is Romans 1:18-32 about all people or only pagan idol worship?
In context, Paul starts with people who reject God’s truth and turn to idolatry and immoral living, but he is building a case that all people stand guilty before God.
What does it mean that God gave them over?
It means God let stubborn sinners follow the path they chose, and that choice led to deeper sin and damage.
Did early Christians think Romans 1 taught real judgment?
Yes. Writers like Tertullian, Origen, Irenaeus, and Theophilus used it to speak of God’s wrath and righteous judgment.
What is the main message of Romans 1:18-32?
The main message is that people who reject God’s truth are given over to sin, and that leads to judgment.
How did early Christians use Romans 1:18-32?
They used it to teach that God’s wrath is just, that false worship is serious, and that sin darkens the mind.
Source Index for Romans 1:18-32
The guided sections above show the strongest quotations. This compact index highlights 160 ranked source links from 255 compiled sources for deeper study.
Source index 160 ranked links shown
Early Christian Writings 80 shown of 147
Primary-source quotations from early Christian writers and church documents.
-
Clement of Rome, Connection to Romans 1:32
Bible Passages 80 shown of 108
Related Bible passages saved for comparison with the early Christian quotations.