Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 5
The chapter notes that some early Christians still used cosmetics or attended the theater and were not immediately put out of the church, yet “most Christians voluntarily followed the direction of the church”; what kind of church authority and discipleship could produce voluntary obedience without heavy policing, and what would have to change in our churches for that to be realistic?
Another way to ask: How could a church lead people to obey willingly without strict monitoring and punishment? What would need to change in our churches for that to happen?

Direct Answer Based on Bercot’s description, voluntary obedience grows where the church teaches clearly, leaders model holiness, and the community shares the same values—so believers follow from conviction rather than fear of punishment. For that to be realistic today, churches would need deeper example-based discipleship and a more distinct shared culture.

Support from Transcript:

  • The early church was “disciplined,” but “generally didn’t try to legislate righteousness” through many rules.
  • Instead they relied on “sound teaching, righteous example, and the transforming work of the Holy Spirit.”
  • Externals were “worthless unless they reflected” inward change; Clement emphasizes abstaining “by choice.”
  • Even when some used cosmetics or attended theater, they “were not put out of the church,” yet Romans testified most “voluntarily followed the direction of the church.”
  • Bercot ties effectiveness to a church body that has “conformed to the teachings of Christ,” otherwise it becomes a hindrance.
Discussion Follow-ups What would it take for your church’s counsel to feel like loving guidance rather than policing? How could leaders and members provide examples that make obedience look possible?