Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Will The Real Heretics Please Stand Up  /  Chapter 5: Why They Succeeded Where We Often Fail  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 4
Clement says God crowns those who abstain from wickedness “by choice,” not “by compulsion,” and that freedom reveals true righteousness and true wickedness; how does that view of God’s desire for voluntary holiness critique both rule-heavy churches and “no-standards” churches?
Another way to ask: If God wants people to choose holiness freely, what does that say to churches with lots of rules? What does it say to churches that have almost no standards?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests Clement’s point corrects both extremes: rule-heavy systems can create outward compliance without real righteousness, while “no-standards” churches fail to call people to genuine, chosen holiness. God wants obedience that is free, willing, and inward, not forced or ignored.

Support from Transcript:

  • Clement: “God does not crown those who abstain…by compulsion, but…by choice.”
  • He adds: “Externals were considered worthless unless they reflected what was happening inside a person.”
  • Bercot warns that churches relying on “a plethora of rules and regulations” can “end up producing pharisees.”
  • Clement: “The one who is made righteous by the compulsion of another is not truly righteous.”
  • Yet the early church was still “disciplined” and gave “counsel” on dress, cosmetics, theater—implying standards existed, but were aimed at inward change and voluntary response.
Discussion Follow-ups Where does your church lean toward compulsion (rules, pressure) or toward silence (no expectations)? How could teaching aim at the heart while still giving clear direction?

Jumpstarter 4 of 10
Back Questions Next