Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 7
Luther’s prefaces are presented as steering readers away from books that emphasize obedience (Matthew, James), and Bercot suggests Luther disparaged Scripture “to advance his own theology”; what do you think the chapter is accusing Luther (and by extension modern evangelicalism) of doing to the Bible in practice, even if not explicitly?
Another way to ask: What is the chapter saying Luther did to the Bible in practice when he downplayed books like Matthew and James? How might modern evangelicals do something similar, even without saying it out loud?

Direct Answer The transcript accuses Luther of functionally ranking and sidelining parts of Scripture that threaten his theology, guiding readers to value certain books as “chief” and dismissing others as less “gospel.” By extension, Bercot implies modern evangelicalism can practice a similar selective reading—honoring the Bible in words while filtering it through a system.

Support from Transcript:

  • Luther’s prefaces “steered the reader’s attention away from parts of the Bible that didn’t fit Luther’s theology.”
  • He elevates John: “the one, tender, true chief gospel… far… preferred to the other three.”
  • He elevates Paul/Peter and demotes James: “Saint James’ epistle is really an epistle of straw.”
  • Bercot challenges Luther’s stated reason and claims motive: “A person doesn’t need to be very perceptive to see what Luther’s real motive was.”
  • The books Luther disparaged “happen to be the very books that indicate that obedience is necessary for salvation,” and Bercot cites Matthew 7:21; Matthew 24:13; James 2:24.
Discussion Follow-ups What modern habits mirror this—quoting some books constantly while explaining away others? How can a church guard against using “canon within the canon” to keep a theology safe from Jesus’ harder sayings?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Back Questions Next