Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 4

Chrysostom is quoted saying that sins after baptism come from “our own spiritual laxity,” because after baptism “we have the power not to walk after the flesh”; what does that assume about baptism, human responsibility, and the Spirit’s empowerment that many modern Christians don’t assume?

Another way to ask: If Chrysostom says sins after baptism happen because we get spiritually lazy even though we now have power not to follow the flesh, what does that say about what baptism does and what we’re responsible for? How does that differ from what many Christians assume today?

Direct Answer The transcript assumes baptism is closely tied to entering a new empowered life where resisting the flesh is truly possible, so post-baptism sin is not blamed on inability but on neglect and choice. It also assumes the Spirit gives real power that makes Christians responsible to “guard” what they have received.

Support from Transcript:

Bercot links conversion and baptism with “immediate forgiveness and justification,” then speaks of ongoing “enabling power through the Holy Spirit.”
Chrysostom: Paul adds “who do not walk after the flesh” because “many fall into sin even after baptism.”
Chrysostom’s conclusion: “all sins that come after baptism are a result of our own spiritual laxity,” because “after baptism, we have the power not to walk after the flesh.”
He contrasts this with the pre-baptism state: “Prior to that, it was a difficult task.”
Chrysostom also warns against relaxing: after receiving deliverance, “it is your responsibility to hold fast to it once it has been given…keep guarding this precious treasure.”

Discussion Follow-ups Do you tend to treat baptism mainly as a symbol, or as entry into a Spirit-empowered life with new obligations? How does this view affect the way you respond after you sin?

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 4 of 10