Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 3

Paul’s “no condemnation” is tied here to “those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk after the flesh, but after the Spirit”; how does making “no condemnation” conditional on an ongoing walk confront common evangelical ways of talking about assurance?

Another way to ask: If “no condemnation” is for those who keep walking by the Spirit, how does that challenge the way many evangelicals talk about being sure you’re saved? What does it do to your idea of assurance?

Direct Answer Based on this lesson, “no condemnation” is not presented as an automatic status for anyone who once believed, but as a promise for those presently “walking” according to the Spirit rather than the flesh. That confronts ways of speaking about assurance that detach salvation promises from ongoing faithfulness.

Support from Transcript:

Romans 8:1 is quoted with the condition: “no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk after the flesh, but after the Spirit.”
Bercot says Paul is now addressing “regenerated Christians” and has “moved beyond initial salvation” to our “continued walk with Christ.”
He explains: there is no condemnation “because they no longer walk after the flesh, but after the Spirit,” tying the promise to a lifestyle.
Chrysostom is quoted saying Paul adds the phrase “who do not walk after the flesh” because “many fall into sin even after baptism,” and Paul shows post-baptism sin results from “our own spiritual laxity.”
Origen’s warning: churchgoing people who do not improve their life “cannot claim the promise…There is now no condemnation…for they are not in Christ Jesus…they live after the flesh.”

Discussion Follow-ups How do you hold together confidence in Christ with serious warnings about walking after the flesh? What does “in Christ Jesus” mean in this transcript—mere identity, or an active way of living?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 3 of 10