Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 5
Theodoret says that after receiving the Spirit, “our desires can no longer get the mastery over us without our own consent”; how does that change the way you interpret recurring temptation and “compulsive” patterns—what role do consent, habits, and spiritual laziness play in your own story?
Another way to ask: If desires can’t control us without our consent after we receive the Spirit, how does that change how you see repeated temptation or “compulsive” habits? In your own life, how much comes from consent, habits you’ve built, or spiritual laziness?

Direct Answer Based on Theodoret’s statement as used in the lesson, recurring temptation is not presented as irresistible fate; after receiving the Spirit, desires rule only with our “consent.” That pushes us to look honestly at where we yield internally, where we have become lax, and where we must actively reject sin “with the assistance of God.”

Support from Transcript:

  • Theodoret: “Now that we have received the gift of the Spirit of God, our desires can no longer get the mastery over us without our own consent.”
  • Bercot emphasizes: we cannot live Christ’s life “on our own strength,” implying we must depend on the Spirit rather than excuse sin.
  • Chrysostom’s related point: sins after baptism come from “our own spiritual laxity,” since we now have “the power not to walk after the flesh.”
  • Ambrosiaster: “Even though sin still remains in our flesh, it will not be able to injure us so long as we reject this sin with the assistance of God.”
  • Romans 8:5 is used to show an ongoing mindset: those after the flesh “mind the things of the flesh,” suggesting repeated patterns are tied to what we habitually focus on.
Discussion Follow-ups Where do you tend to call something “compulsive” in a way that removes responsibility? What practical steps help you withdraw “consent” and re-set your mind toward “the things of the Spirit”?