Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Discussion Questions

PDF
Tip: Discuss these with your study group.
The chapter opens by calling Scripture “the basis of truth” and urges people not to stop searching until they get “proof from the Scripture themselves”; what would change in your current beliefs or church loyalties if you treated “proof from Scripture” as the final court of appeal rather than trusted teachers, traditions, or your own instincts? JumpstartAnother way to ask: If you treated “proof from Scripture” as the final authority, how might your beliefs or loyalty to your church change compared to trusting teachers, tradition, or your own feelings?
The author connects seeking truth with Jesus’ warning that the entrance to eternal rest is “narrow” and “requires toil” (Matt. 7:14); what kinds of “toil” does this chapter assume are normal for Christians, and how does that confront modern expectations of an easy, low-cost discipleship? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What kinds of hard work does the chapter say Christians should expect when seeking truth, and how does that challenge the idea that following Jesus should be easy?
The chapter warns against turning back “like Lot’s wife,” returning to “sensual things,” or returning to “heresies,” and then ties this to being “unworthy” (Luke 9:62); what does this suggest about God’s expectations for perseverance, and how does it challenge common modern assurances that backing away has little spiritual consequence? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What does the warning about turning back (like Lot’s wife) say about how much God expects us to keep going, and how does it challenge the idea that backing away doesn’t matter much spiritually?
The chapter’s unusual analogy compares Mary’s continued virginity to Scripture “giving birth through the truth” while remaining “virgin in the concealment of the mysteries”; how does this analogy shape the way you think about Scripture’s clarity versus mystery, and what posture does it demand when you come to hard or hidden teachings? JumpstartAnother way to ask: How does the Mary-and-Scripture comparison shape how you see Scripture as both clear and mysterious, and how should that affect your attitude toward hard-to-understand teachings?
The author contrasts those who “let the word speak” and build proofs from it with those who “give themselves up to pleasures” and “distort Scripture to agree with their lust” (2 Pet. 3:16); where do you see desire (comfort, reputation, sexual ethics, money, autonomy) pressuring interpretation today, and how can a group honestly detect that pressure in itself? JumpstartAnother way to ask: Where do you see desires like comfort, approval, sex, money, or control pushing people to twist Scripture today, and how can a group notice when that is happening in itself?
He says the “lover of truth needs force of soul,” because people who “attempt the greatest things often fail” unless they “follow the rule of truth and cleave to truth”; what do you think “force of soul” looks like in daily life, and what practices would actually build that kind of inner strength? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What might “force of soul” look like in everyday life, and what habits could help build that kind of inner strength to stick with the truth?
The chapter describes leaving the beliefs “handed down by the Church” for heretical opinions as becoming like mythical men turned into beasts, and repentance as being changed “from men into gods”; what underlying assumptions about the Church’s received teaching and the stakes of doctrinal drift are being made here, and how would early Christians likely have acted on those assumptions? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What does the chapter assume about the Church’s handed-down teaching and how serious it is to drift into heresy, and how do you think early Christians would have responded?
The author argues that if we think “another source is necessary” besides the Lord teaching through prophets, Gospel, and apostles, “the true source could no longer be preserved,” and that the voice of the Lord is “the only proof”; what “other sources” function as practical authorities in your life (experience, scholarship, inner impressions, church culture), and how would this chapter require you to re-order them? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What other things act like authorities in your life besides Scripture (like experience, experts, inner feelings, or church culture), and how would this chapter say you should rank them?
He distinguishes “simple believers” who have only “tasted the Scriptures” from those “intimate with God” who become accurate teachers able to explain passages from the rest of Scripture; what does this imply about spiritual maturity and responsibility, and how does it challenge the modern idea that deep doctrinal competence is optional for ordinary Christians? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What does the chapter suggest about how maturity in faith connects to knowing Scripture well, and how does that challenge the idea that most Christians don’t need deep understanding?
The section on heretics lists specific tactics—quoting selectively, not quoting entire passages, taking texts out of context, choosing ambiguity, using words while altering meaning—and then claims the real issue is self-love, pride, and desire for honor (“first seats” and “prominent couch”); where do you see these exact tactics and motives operating in modern Christian debates, and what would repentance look like if you recognized those motives in yourself? JumpstartAnother way to ask: Where do you see people using the listed debate tricks (cherry-picking verses, ignoring context, using vague wording) in Christian arguments today, and what would it look like to repent if you saw pride or wanting attention driving you?

Discussion Jumpstarter

Discussion stalled? Read the Jumpstarter for help getting conversation flowing again.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Discussion stalled? Read the Jumpstarter for help getting conversation flowing again.