Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
The chapter opens by calling Scripture “the basis of truth” and urges people not to stop searching until they get “proof from the Scripture themselves”; what would change in your current beliefs or church loyalties if you treated “proof from Scripture” as the final court of appeal rather than trusted teachers, traditions, or your own instincts?
Another way to ask: If you treated “proof from Scripture” as the final authority, how might your beliefs or loyalty to your church change compared to trusting teachers, tradition, or your own feelings?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, treating “proof from Scripture” as the final court of appeal would require you to hold teachers, traditions, and instincts loosely, and to test and even abandon beliefs or loyalties that can’t be verified by “the voice of the Lord.”

Support from Transcript:

  • “The Scriptures are the basis of truth,” and seekers “will not stop searching for truth until they get the proof from the Scripture themselves.”
  • He urges abandoning “mere human opinion” and choosing “accurate knowledge over the false wisdom of human opinion.”
  • “We should not give our loyalty to men simply on the basis of their bare statements, for tomorrow they might state the opposite.”
  • When something “must be confirmed…we must verify it by the voice of the Lord…In fact, it’s the only proof.”
  • He praises those who “let the word speak” and “build proofs from it,” using Scripture to interpret Scripture.
Discussion Follow-ups What loyalties in your life are currently “confirmed” mainly by people’s testimony or church culture rather than by Scripture examined carefully and in context?