Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
The chapter describes leaving the beliefs “handed down by the Church” for heretical opinions as becoming like mythical men turned into beasts, and repentance as being changed “from men into gods”; what underlying assumptions about the Church’s received teaching and the stakes of doctrinal drift are being made here, and how would early Christians likely have acted on those assumptions?
Another way to ask: What does the chapter assume about the Church’s handed-down teaching and how serious it is to drift into heresy, and how do you think early Christians would have responded?

Direct Answer The transcript assumes the Church has beliefs “handed down” that mark true faithfulness, and that drifting into heretical opinions is spiritually dehumanizing; repentance through hearing Scripture restores a person to truth, so early Christians would likely cling to received teaching and use Scripture to call heretics back.

Support from Transcript:

  • “He who has rejected the beliefs handed down by the Church and has darted off to the opinions of heretical men has ceased to be a man of God.”
  • He likens such a person to mythical men “who became beasts,” implying doctrinal drift changes one’s spiritual state.
  • Restoration comes by Scripture: “if upon hearing the Scriptures he leaves the deception and turns to the truth.”
  • He says Christ is the source of teaching and “teaches through the prophets, the Gospel, and the blessed apostles.”
  • He describes challengers “constantly proving them to be an error” and overturning doctrines by showing contradiction with Scripture.
Discussion Follow-ups Do you treat doctrinal drift as mainly an intellectual mistake, or as a spiritual danger that changes a person’s faithfulness and character?