Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Bercot argues that we “will never be able to get into the mindset of the Apostles and the New Testament Christians” until we recognize Christianity’s Eastern character. What parts of the New Testament might we misunderstand if we approach the apostles mainly through Western rationalism?
Another way to ask: Bercot says we cannot understand the apostles well unless we see Christianity’s Eastern roots. What parts of the New Testament might we misunderstand if we read it with only a Western, logical mindset?

Direct Answer

The transcript does not name specific New Testament passages, but it suggests that Western rationalism may cause us to misunderstand apostolic uses of allegory, historical patterns, and incomprehensible spiritual truths. We may also impose legal or overly rational categories onto texts written from a different mindset.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says we cannot “get into the mindset of the Apostles and the New Testament Christians” without recognizing Christianity’s Eastern character. - He contrasts “Eastern thinking” with “Western rationalism.” - He says Eastern thought more readily grasps “allegorical truths that are prefigured by actual historical events.” - He says the Eastern mind may believe “incomprehensible spiritual truths” that the Western rationalistic mind rejects. - He also identifies a “Western tendency toward legalism.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript leaves the exact New Testament examples unstated. But it gives categories for discussion: allegory, fulfillment, mystery, spiritual realities, and the danger of reading apostolic teaching as if it were written in modern Western legal or rationalistic form.