Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 3
Origen was referenced as saying gifted leaders and orators are needed “in the church, not in the world.” If your most persuasive, strategic, and educated Christians stopped aiming those gifts at elections and activism, what would change inside your congregation—and what would you fear losing?
Another way to ask: If your smartest and most persuasive Christians stopped focusing on elections and activism, what would change in your church, and what would you worry about losing?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, the church would likely become stronger and more mission-focused if its best leadership energy moved from “the world” to “the kingdom,” but people might fear losing influence, protection, or a sense of control over society.

Support from Transcript:

  • David recalls Origen’s point (as Clark paraphrases): capable leaders and “great orators…their service is needed in the church, not in the world.”
  • Dean says the early church’s focus was not mainly “non-involvement,” but “creating the kingdom of Christ through the church,” implying major internal work.
  • David: early Christians viewed politics as “a different kingdom,” and kept “hands…minds…hearts focused on a different kingdom.”
  • Dean frames political engagement as a sign of misplaced hope: it can mean you’re “starting to think you don’t have the cures in the kingdom of God.”
  • David criticizes partisan narratives as “lies” that pull believers into giving “a halo on one side and a devil…on the other,” suggesting church leaders should resist that discipling.
Discussion Follow-ups What ministries in your local church would immediately improve if your best thinkers stopped spending energy on political news? What do you assume politics can give you that the church cannot?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next