Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 2
Dean Taylor insisted the early Christians’ political “non-involvement” was not merely negative withdrawal but a positive, busy commitment to “creating the kingdom of Christ through the church.” What kinds of church practices and priorities would have to be true for a community to genuinely “not have time for the politics of this world”?
Another way to ask: What would a church have to be doing so actively that it truly wouldn’t have time or interest for the politics of this world?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests a church would have to be actively occupied with kingdom mission—spreading the gospel, building up the church, and changing lives—so that political battles feel like a distraction from their real work.

Support from Transcript:

  • Dean: early Christians weren’t just “not being involved,” but were “positive[ly] creating… the kingdom of Christ through the church.”
  • Dean says they were “incredibly involved with world change…helping the social structure…plant the kingdom of Christ,” and “just didn’t have time for the politics of this world.”
  • David connects this to identity: “We’ve already got our kingdom…Why would we get involved in the affairs of this world?”
  • Origen is referenced: gifted speakers and leaders are needed “in the church, not in the world,” implying church life required serious talent and effort.
  • David: Acts and the letters show Christians focused on “getting out the message of the kingdom of God…pulling them out of this system into a different system.”
Discussion Follow-ups What “good” church activities might still be too small if politics keeps feeling central? What would it cost to reorder time, money, and gifted people toward kingdom work?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10
Back Questions Next