Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 3

The author notes evangelicals once rejected divorce for “incompatibility,” but now match the world’s divorce rate; what specific cultural shifts (not changes in Scripture) do you think moved the “conservative block,” and how have those shifts quietly reshaped what churches consider “biblical” or “reasonable”?

Another way to ask: What changes in culture (not in the Bible) do you think led many evangelicals to accept “incompatibility” divorce and end up with the same divorce rate as everyone else? How have those changes quietly shifted what churches call “biblical” or “reasonable”?

Direct Answer The transcript’s answer is that the “conservative block” changed, and evangelicals largely moved with it; Scripture did not. Bercot suggests the shift happens when a practice becomes normal among conservative society, so churches begin to treat it as “reasonable,” then later find ways to frame that reasonableness as “biblical.”

Support from Transcript:

Bercot contrasts then and now: “Forty years ago, an evangelical…wouldn’t have dreamed of divorcing…because of incompatibility. Yet today, the divorce rate among evangelicals equals that of the world.”
He asks, “So what has changed? Certainly not Scripture. Rather, the conservative block of American society has changed its viewpoint on divorce.”
He notes a pattern: Christians often oppose only “the liberal segment of the world.”
“Once a practice is accepted by the conservative element, the Church soon follows in stride. Divorce has been a prime example.”
His “the road has moved” story illustrates how what counts as conservative shifts over time.

Discussion Follow-ups Bercot doesn’t list specific causes (economics, psychology, no-fault divorce laws, etc.), so the group will have to supply possible examples cautiously. What new “reasonable” assumptions have churches absorbed without noticing?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 3 of 10