Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 8
Bercot says Pelagius/Calistius “weren’t that far removed” from early Christians because early Christians held both personal responsibility and the real need for saving and empowering grace. What does it look like, in lived experience, to hold together “we are capable of living obediently to God” and “without grace, there can be no salvation” without collapsing into either self-reliance or passivity?
Another way to ask: In real life, how can someone hold both “we can obey God” and “we need God’s grace to be saved” without becoming either proud and self-reliant or lazy and passive?

Direct Answer In the transcript’s terms, holding both truths means taking real responsibility to obey God while simultaneously depending on God’s grace as necessary for both salvation and power to live rightly. It avoids self-reliance by refusing to treat obedience as self-salvation, and avoids passivity by refusing to deny human responsibility.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says Pelagius and even Salestius “weren’t that far removed from those of the early Christians.”
  • He summarizes early Christian emphases: “each person is responsible for his own sins.”
  • He adds: early Christians believed “we are capable of living obediently to God.”
  • Yet they also “recognize that we all stand in need of God’s grace, both His saving grace and His empowering grace.”
  • He states plainly: “Without grace, there can be no salvation.”
  • He contrasts this balanced approach with Augustine’s overreaction that removed “free will and man’s involvement in salvation.”
Discussion Follow-ups What daily practices help you live as if obedience matters, while still treating grace as essential rather than optional help?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next