Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 3
Irenaeus calls it “unlawful” to claim the apostles preached without “perfect knowledge,” and he mocks heretics as “improvers of the apostles”; where do you see the temptation today to function as “improvers” of the apostles, and what motives might drive that impulse?
Another way to ask: Where do you see people today acting like they can “improve” what the apostles taught? What reasons might make someone want to do that?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, the “improver” temptation appears wherever Christians assume the apostles were incomplete, mistaken, or outdated and need modern correction or supplementation. Bercot ties that impulse to the same kind of motive he attributes to heretics: wanting “new revelation” and presenting oneself as more enlightened than the apostolic message.

Support from Transcript:

  • Irenaeus: “It is unlawful to claim that the apostles preached before they possessed perfect knowledge… boasting themselves as improvers of the apostles.”
  • “Nearly all the heretics claimed to have new revelation beyond the teachings of the apostles.”
  • The early church believed the apostles “taught nothing in error” and their teachings applied “to Christians in all ages.”
  • The church rejected novelty: it “summarily rejected any teaching… that hadn’t been heard from the lips of the apostles.”
  • Bercot contrasts integrity with agenda-driven theology (later using Luther as an example of steering readers away from texts that didn’t fit a system).
Discussion Follow-ups What forms of “improving” look respectable today (academic updates, new spiritual insights, cultural pressure)? How can we tell whether the motive is humility before apostolic teaching or a desire to reshape it?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next