Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 2
Tertullian argues that “no others should be received as preachers…as of original doctrine, than those whom Christ appointed”; what does that imply about God’s intent in choosing apostles as the unique, foundational witnesses, and what does it imply about the limits of later Christian teachers (including popular modern ones)?
Another way to ask: If only the apostles were meant to be the original teachers of Christian truth, why did God choose them for that role? What limits does that put on later teachers, even famous ones today?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests God intended the apostles to be the unique, authorized source of “original doctrine,” so later teachers can explain and pass on apostolic teaching but must not claim to originate new doctrine. Popular modern teachers, then, are limited to being faithful transmitters rather than founders of fresh “rules of faith.”

Support from Transcript:

  • Tertullian: “Since the Lord Jesus Christ sent the apostles to preach, no others should be received as preachers… as of original doctrine, than those whom Christ appointed.”
  • “The Son did not reveal his Father to any other than the apostles… to preach these things he revealed to them.”
  • The church’s core stance: “there was no special revelation after the apostles,” and apostolic teaching was not “outdated.”
  • Early conflict with heretics: “Nearly all the heretics claimed to have new revelation beyond the teachings of the apostles.”
  • The church rejected messages even if impressive: “If… an angel from heaven should preach any other gospel, we would call him… cursed.”
Discussion Follow-ups How do we recognize when a teacher is merely clarifying apostolic teaching versus presenting “original doctrine”? What safeguards would keep admiration for gifted teachers from becoming doctrinal dependence?