Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
True Greatness  /  John Wesley  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 2
Wesley (as Bercot summarizes him) distinguishes a past “we were saved” from a future “will be saved” tied to “He who endures to the end”; how does that two-fold view of salvation reshape what “assurance” means, and what would it require a church to stop saying or start saying to be honest to that framework?
Another way to ask: If salvation is both “we were saved” and “we will be saved if we endure,” how does that change what “assurance” means? What would your church need to stop saying or start saying to match that view?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests assurance is not confidence in a past event alone, but confidence that we must keep an obedient relationship with Christ to the end. A church would need to stop speaking as if salvation is automatically “finished” at conversion and start speaking about endurance, obedience, and the future aspect of being saved.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says Wesley understood salvation “in two senses”: a past event when we are “initially converted and born again,” when “we were saved.”
  • But “our ultimate salvation depends on maintaining an obedient love relationship with Christ throughout the remainder of our lives.”
  • He ties this to Jesus’ words: “He who endures to the end will be saved,” emphasizing “a future aspect of salvation, not just a past one.”
  • Bercot contrasts Wesley with “cheap grace,” “eternal security,” and righteousness treated as merely “a bookkeeping entry in heaven.”
  • He says Wesley believed Jesus “actually makes us righteous” as we live obediently with Him.
Discussion Follow-ups What would change in church invitations, counseling, and baptism interviews if leaders openly taught both the past and future sense of salvation?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10
Back Questions Next