Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
David Bercot points out that Wesley mentions the Aldersgate experience only once in 7,560 pages; what does that suggest about what Wesley thought conversion was (and was not), and how does that confront the way modern evangelicals often center “my conversion story” as the defining marker of Christian life?
Another way to ask: If Wesley barely talked about his Aldersgate experience, what does that say about what he thought conversion is (and isn’t)? How does that challenge the modern habit of treating “my conversion story” as the main proof of real Christianity?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, Wesley valued conversion but did not treat it as the finish line; it was a real beginning, not the defining proof that everything was settled forever. That challenges a “conversion story” focus that treats one past moment as the main marker of Christian life instead of ongoing obedient life in Christ.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot stresses the disproportion: 14 volumes, about 7,560 pages, but Aldersgate is referenced “a grand total of one.”
  • He says Aldersgate was “a major turning point” where Wesley came to appreciate “the key role that grace plays,” after trying holiness “that was not a spirit-filled life.”
  • Yet Bercot adds: Wesley “knew there was far more to the Christian life than just being converted.”
  • “He never believed that conversion was an end in itself, that salvation was all finished at that point.”
  • Wesley’s focus is framed as maintaining “an obedient love relationship with Christ throughout the remainder of our lives.”
Discussion Follow-ups How would your testimony sound if it included not only how you “began,” but how you are presently enduring, obeying, and being changed?