Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 5
Several early sources (including the Apostolic Constitutions) argue that someone can face “future punishment” for compelling another to lust; how do you evaluate that claim biblically and morally, and what would it do to modern evangelical assumptions about personal responsibility and “I’m not responsible for someone else’s sin”?
Another way to ask: Some early Christians said you could be judged for leading someone else into lust. Does that fit with the Bible and basic right and wrong, and how would it change the idea, “I’m not responsible for someone else’s sin”?

Direct Answer Bercot presents early Christian teaching that causing lust is morally serious and can bring judgment, even if you didn’t commit the outward act yourself. He doesn’t build a full biblical argument beyond connecting modesty to lust, but he clearly challenges the modern idea that you bear no responsibility for how you provoke others.

Support from Transcript:

  • Tertullian: one who causes another’s fall may not have “impunity,” because “that other person perishes as soon as he has felt lust,” and “you have been made the sword that destroys him.”
  • Another Tertullian quote: “Are we to paint ourselves out so that our neighbors may perish? What happened to you will love your neighbor as yourself?”
  • Apostolic Constitutions to wives: even if done “only for the sake of adornment,” “you still will not escape future punishment for having compelled another… to lust.”
  • Bercot summarizes: “the early church saw that this matter of lust is serious business for brothers and sisters alike.”
  • He frames modesty as the “flip side” of Jesus’ teaching on lust, implying shared responsibility in preventing adultery-in-the-heart.
  • He warns against casualness because Jesus ties lust to hell in Matthew 5.
Discussion Follow-ups How does “love your neighbor as yourself” reshape the way you think about dressing and presentation? How can we affirm personal responsibility for lust while also taking seriously the responsibility not to entice?