Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 10
David argues that translating Hades/Gehenna/Tartarus all as “hell” and treating “Godhead” as a distinct entity shows how archaic or imprecise translation can create theological distortions; how should a serious Christian decide when loyalty to a cherished translation becomes loyalty to a tradition that can mislead, and what concrete changes would that require in your Bible reading, preaching/teaching, and memorization habits?
Another way to ask: If a translation blurs important word differences (like different words all turned into “hell”), it can shape people’s beliefs in the wrong way. How do you know when loyalty to a favorite Bible becomes loyalty to a misleading tradition, and what would you change in how you read, teach, and memorize Scripture?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, a serious Christian should choose understanding and accuracy of meaning over attachment to a frozen tradition, especially when word-shifts create “skewed theological understanding.” Concretely, that means using a modern-language revision (even one based on the same Greek text) and adjusting teaching and memorization so people grasp what Scripture actually says.

Support from Transcript:

  • David says KJV’s single word “hell” covers three Greek words: “Hades, Gehenna, and Tartarus,” which early Christians saw as “three very different things.”
  • He gives the doctrinal consequence: people read “Jesus descended into hell” and think “lake of fire,” but the Greek is “Hades,” and in KJV-era English “hell” meant “underworld.”
  • He argues “bad theology can come out because of the change in meaning of words.”
  • On “Godhead,” he says it originally meant “godhood,” but today people treat it as “a new entity…a Godhead,” creating confusion.
  • He points to solutions that keep the same text base: NKJV is “a fresh translation…from the exact same Greek text,” and he also names updated KJV revisions like the “Third Millennium Bible.”
Discussion Follow-ups What would it look like to prioritize your listeners’ understanding (children, seekers, new believers) when choosing what to read publicly and what to memorize?