Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 6
William Law is quoted: “A confession that is without this sorrow and compunction of heart has nothing in it either to make amends for past sins or to produce in us any true reform and amendment of life.” What is being claimed about the connection between emotion, confession, and actual life change—and what objections do modern Christians raise to that claim?
Another way to ask: What is William Law saying about how real sorrow connects to confession and real change? What pushback might Christians today give to the idea that you need to feel deep sorrow to truly repent?

Direct Answer The transcript claims that heartfelt sorrow (“compunction of heart”) is not optional but closely connected to confession that actually leads to making amends and real reform. The transcript does not directly list modern objections, though it implies many people treat confession too quickly or lightly.

Support from Transcript:

  • William Law is quoted saying confession without “sorrow and compunction of heart” has “nothing in it” to “make amends” or produce “true reform and amendment of life.”
  • Bercot frames repentance as “profound remorse” and “deep sorrow,” not merely verbal admission.
  • He says repentance is more than a quick “I’m sorry,” suggesting a common pattern of shallow confession.
  • He connects repentance to action: “Part of making amends is to apologize to any persons we may have hurt and ask for their forgiveness.”
  • His threefold benefits focus on particular sins and preparing for future victory, implying confession should result in change.
Discussion Follow-ups What fears might cause someone to resist connecting sorrow with repentance (for example, fear of emotionalism or fear of losing assurance)? The transcript doesn’t answer this directly, but it’s worth discussing.