Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 8
Origen says the catalog of sins (“throat is an open grave,” etc.) is not that every person commits every sin, but that “the totality of humanity is filled with these vices”; how does that way of reading corporate guilt and human corruption confront modern individualism in how we confess sin and seek healing?
Another way to ask: If the sin list means humanity as a whole is full of these sins (not that each person does every one), how does that challenge our “it’s just me” way of thinking? How might it change how we confess sin and seek healing?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, Origen’s reading pushes us to confess not only “my isolated sins” but our shared human corruption: even if each person has different vices, together “all the world” is guilty and needs the same remedy of faith.

Support from Transcript:

  • Origen: Paul is “not saying that every individual is guilty of all these things.”
  • Instead, “one vice is found in one person, another vice… in someone else,” so “the totality of humanity is filled with these vices.”
  • The conclusion is corporate: “All the world is guilty,” tied to Romans 3:19 (“all the world may become guilty before God”).
  • Paul’s overall thesis: “both Jews and Gentiles are all under sin,” so no group can claim exemption.
  • The physician metaphor implies diagnosis is necessary before “medicine of faith,” so recognizing shared guilt is part of coming for healing.
Discussion Follow-ups Where do you minimize sin by saying, “That’s not my issue,” while ignoring the broader ways humanity (and the church) participates in corruption? How might corporate confession and shared repentance better match Paul’s “all… under sin” emphasis?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next