Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 5

The “root and branch petition” complains that ministers won’t preach predestination, perseverance, strict Sabbath, and teaching “against universal grace”; what does this reveal about what the Puritans considered “the truth of God,” and how does that collide with the Anglican conclusions Bercot mentions (human free will and grace available to everyone)?

Another way to ask: Why were the Puritans so upset that ministers wouldn’t preach things like predestination and a strict Sabbath? How does their idea of “God’s truth” clash with the Anglican view that people have free will and God’s grace is for everyone?

Direct Answer The petition shows the Puritans treated distinctly Calvinist doctrines (predestination, “free grace,” perseverance, and denying “universal grace”) plus strict Sabbath teaching as core “truth of God,” directly clashing with Anglican convictions about free will and grace offered to everyone.

Support from Transcript:

The petition complains of “faint-heartedness of ministers to preach the truth of God,” naming “predestination…free grace…perseverance…[and] the Sabbath.”
It also complains about teaching “against universal grace,” implying universal grace was rejected as error.
Bercot says Anglicans, influenced by early Christian studies, concluded humans “do have free will…[not] obliterated,” including the “ability to believe.”
He says Anglicans also believed “God’s offer of grace is available to everyone,” and “Nobody is predestined to damnation…before they’re even born.”
Bercot states plainly: “Both of those doctrines were absolutely intolerable to the Puritans.”

Discussion Follow-ups What doctrines do we treat as the litmus test for “truth,” and how do we handle serious disagreement without assuming the other side is simply cowardly or faithless?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10