Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 4
Bercot says Calvin’s system had a “very positive side” because the elect can know “beyond doubt” they are elect and “cannot possibly lose” salvation; how does that kind of assurance function psychologically and socially in a community, and what dangers does Bercot suggest it produced in Geneva?
Another way to ask: If the “elect” feel totally sure they can’t lose salvation, how might that affect them and their community? What harm does Bercot say this kind of certainty caused in Geneva?

Direct Answer Bercot suggests this assurance creates a highly confident, self-assured group who feel secure and validated, which can energize a movement and make it spread. But in Geneva it also fueled harshness: dissent was crushed, people were coerced, and violence was justified because leaders felt certain they were executing God’s will.

Support from Transcript:

  • The “positive side” is that the elect can know “beyond doubt” they are elect and “cannot possibly lose” salvation.
  • Bercot says Calvin’s success came because “the only ones who embraced his theology were those who were certain they were of the elect.”
  • He later describes Calvinists as “energetic, hardworking, visionary, and enormously self-assured.”
  • In Geneva, citizens had to accept Calvin’s catechism as “the one and only true doctrine” or be “banished.”
  • Calvin ran a “religious police state,” with officers examining private life, interrogating neighbors and even “children…about their parents.”
  • Opposition led to torture/execution (Gruet tortured and beheaded; Servetus burned alive; opponents drawn and quartered).
Discussion Follow-ups How can strong assurance in salvation be held with humility, gentleness, and openness to correction rather than fear-driven control?