Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 9
The early Christians saw the slaughtered infants as the first martyrs—“they died for Jesus,” even “in place of Jesus,” and possibly among the first to meet Him when He descended to Hades; what emotions or objections does that reading provoke, and what does it reveal about early Christian assumptions regarding martyrdom, suffering, and God’s mysterious providence?
Another way to ask: How do you feel about the idea that the murdered babies were the first martyrs who died “for” Jesus, and what does that tell you about how early Christians thought about suffering and God’s hidden purposes?

Direct Answer Bercot acknowledges the event is “terrible” and “tragic,” yet says early Christians—living under persecution—could also see a mysterious blessing: these infants were honored as the first martyrs, even dying “in place of Jesus,” revealing a worldview where martyrdom is not sought but is spiritually meaningful when it comes.

Support from Transcript:

  • He calls the massacre “one of the saddest…passages,” “terrible…tragic,” showing he shares the emotional weight.
  • He contrasts modern reactions with early Christians: they lived when believers were “on a regular basis…being put to death for the name of Christ.”
  • He says martyrdom was “something to look up to,” though “you certainly wouldn’t go out and try to be a martyr…taught against…you were to flee.”
  • Early Christians saw the infants as “the very first martyrs for Jesus Christ,” and he says God “gave them that privilege.”
  • He adds the unique claim: “no one else except for those infants died in place of Jesus…Herod killed them thinking he was killing Jesus,” and he speculates they were “among the first to meet Jesus when he went down into Hades.”
Discussion Follow-ups What parts of this reading are comforting, and what parts feel troubling or hard to accept? How does our distance from persecution shape what we consider “reasonable” interpretations of suffering?