Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 10
Bercot argues Matthew’s “spoken by the prophets” (plural) about Jesus being called a Nazarene is not a missing quotation but a general fulfillment tied to “Nazarite” (set apart/holy), and he critiques modern quotation marks driving confusion; how does this discussion challenge modern habits of reading prophecy (and Bible translation choices), and what would it mean in practical terms to treat “set-apart holiness” as central to Jesus’ identity—and therefore to His followers?
Another way to ask: How does the “Nazarene” discussion challenge how we read prophecy and Bible translations, and what would it look like day to day if Jesus (and His followers) are meant to be “set apart” and holy?

Direct Answer Bercot challenges the modern habit of hunting for a word-for-word Old Testament quote when Matthew signals a broader prophetic theme; practically, he frames “Nazarene” as pointing to Jesus as “set apart” (like a Nazarite), making holiness—not just proof-texting—central to understanding Jesus and those who belong to Him.

Support from Transcript:

  • He names the puzzle: “Where does it say that he will be called a Nazarene?” and says many modern answers are invented or claim “this might be a lost part of the Bible.”
  • He cites Jerome’s key observation: Matthew says “spoken by the prophets” (plural), unlike other places where he names “the prophet” (singular), so it’s not one specific citation.
  • He critiques translation punctuation: modern Bibles add quotation marks (“He will be called a Nazarene”), but “in ancient Greek…there were no quotation marks,” so translators may mislead readers.
  • He reports early Christian consensus: they link “Nazarene” with “Nazarite,” only “one letter difference” in Greek.
  • He defines the theme: a Nazarite is “separated apart to be holy,” and thus “all of the prophecies…pointing to someone…separate…who would live a holy life.”
Discussion Follow-ups How often do translation conventions (like quotation marks) shape what we assume Scripture is doing? If Jesus’ identity is “set apart/holy,” what should Christians expect that to look like in daily life and church discipline?