Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Matthew: The Chief Gospel  /  Genealogy Gems: Unearthing Christ's Lineage (Matthew Chapter 1)  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 5
The argument that Mary was also a descendant of David is built from Jewish marriage expectations (marrying within clan/kin), Gabriel’s words to Mary about “his father David,” and Psalm 132 in the Septuagint (“fruit of your womb”); how convincing do you find this cumulative case, and what does it reveal about how early Christians reasoned from Scripture and cultural practice together?
Another way to ask: How convincing is the argument that Mary was also from David’s family, based on marriage customs, Gabriel’s words, and Psalm 132? What does this show about how early Christians used both Scripture and culture to make their case?

Direct Answer Based on Bercot’s presentation, the cumulative case is meant to be persuasive because it stacks cultural expectation with direct angelic wording and a prophecy, and he says it “lines up with what’s in the Bible.” It shows early Christians reasoning by combining Scripture, wording details, and known Jewish customs.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says this was “totally new” to him, but after “digging…everything they say lines up with what’s in the Bible.”
  • He cites Philo: husbands should “preferably…be relatives,” and at least “of the same division and tribe.”
  • He quotes Numbers: daughters should marry “someone from among those of the clan of her father,” not merely the tribe.
  • Therefore, once Joseph is shown Davidic, Matthew has “establish[ed] that Mary was as well,” since a godly family would marry within that kin line.
  • Gabriel’s message: “God will grant him the throne of his father, David,” said while Mary is not yet married; Bercot argues that implies Mary herself is Davidic.
  • Psalm 132 (Septuagint): “I will set upon your throne the fruit of your womb,” pointing to a bodily descendant.
Discussion Follow-ups What are the strengths and weaknesses of using cultural practice as part of a biblical argument, and where should we be cautious?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10
Back Questions Next