Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 4
Bercot says Matthew’s genealogy of Joseph matters because most people (including unbelievers) assumed Joseph was Jesus’ father and because Joseph was Jesus’ legal/adoptive father; what does this imply about how God works through legal standing, adoption, and ordinary human structures—and how does that confront modern instincts to treat “biological” as the only “real” family?
Another way to ask: If Joseph’s genealogy matters because people saw him as Jesus’ father and he was Jesus’ legal/adoptive father, what does that say about God working through adoption and legal family ties? How does that push back on the idea that only biological family is “real”?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests God’s purposes can run through legal and social realities like adoption and covenant responsibility, not only genetics; Joseph’s legal fatherhood truly mattered for Jesus’ Davidic standing. That challenges the instinct to treat “real” family as only biological.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says nonbelievers assumed Joseph was Jesus’ father, so to persuade them you “start with Joseph” before asking them to accept the virgin birth.
  • For believers, Joseph still matters because he was “the adoptive father of Jesus…he took on the parentage of Jesus.”
  • Examples: Joseph took Jesus “to the temple,” ensured He was “circumcised,” and that “he was given a name.”
  • Mary herself spoke that way: “Your father and I have been looking for you.”
  • Bercot states plainly: “An adoptive father is just as much a father as…a genetic father.”
  • Conclusion: “Legally through Joseph, Jesus was a descendant of King David.”
Discussion Follow-ups How should Joseph’s role shape the way Christians honor adoptive parents, step-parents, and other forms of “ordinary” family responsibility?