Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 4

The chapter says, “We can possess God through knowledge and understanding… For the only true life is this: to know him and take him for your own, to love him and to become like him,” and then adds, “Ignorance of him is death.” How does this definition of “life” challenge versions of Christianity that treat salvation mainly as a legal status, and what practices would actually aim at “knowing God” in the sense described here?

Another way to ask: If real life is “knowing God, loving him, and becoming like him,” how does that challenge a view of salvation that is mostly a legal status? What habits would actually help someone know God in this deeper way?

Direct Answer Bercot’s definition of life challenges a merely legal or status-based view of salvation by locating “true life” in knowing God, loving Him, and becoming like Him; “ignorance of him is death.” Practices aimed at salvation, then, must pursue real knowledge of God as the “unchanging… source and support of life,” not just external compliance.

Support from Transcript:

“We can possess God through knowledge and understanding.”
“For the only true life is this: to know him and take him for your own, to love him and to become like him.”
“Ignorance of him is death,” because “the only true life” is knowing God.
He says this knowledge is foundational: “The primary lesson for life must be implanted in the soul from the beginning.”
He stresses dependence on revelation: “No one knows [the Father] unless the Son reveals him” (Matthew 11:27).

Discussion Follow-ups What “Christian” practices might still leave a person ignorant of God personally? How do we pursue knowledge of God that leads to becoming like Him rather than just collecting information?

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 4 of 10