Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 6
Bercot comments, “With fortunes to be made, it was not difficult for the New England colonists and churches to close their eyes to the wickedness”; what forms of “closing our eyes” feel most plausible for sincere believers today—especially when the benefits are indirect (retirement accounts, cheap goods, institutional funding)?
Another way to ask: What are realistic ways sincere Christians today might “close their eyes” to evil when money is involved? How might this happen through things like retirement funds, cheap products, or church funding?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, “closing our eyes” happens when profit and comfort spread so widely that people—churches included—choose not to look honestly at the harm behind their prosperity, especially when responsibility is shared and indirect.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot explicitly links wealth to moral blindness: “With fortunes to be made… it was not difficult… to close their eyes to the wickedness.”
  • He shows the profit incentive was enormous (slaves bought for “five to ten pounds” sold for “30 to 80” pounds).
  • The evil was not hidden at the edges: rum and slave industries were “at the heart of the New England economy.”
  • Many respectable jobs depended on it: coopers, sailmakers, dockworkers, insurers, lawyers, clerks, newspapers—creating social pressure not to question the system.
  • The benefits extended to “comfortable homes,” “household servants,” and luxury purchases like “silver goods” and “fancy dresses,” making the injustice feel like normal life.
Discussion Follow-ups What information would we have to stop avoiding in order to see whether our comfort is supported by wrongdoing we’d condemn if it were closer to home?