Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 2
In the Job narrative, David emphasizes that God Himself calls Job “blameless and upright” and that Satan attacks Job’s motives rather than denying Job’s righteousness; what does that detail suggest about how God evaluates “righteousness” in fallen humans, and what does it challenge in common evangelical instincts about “filthy rags”?
Another way to ask: In Job, God calls Job “blameless and upright,” and Satan attacks Job’s motives instead of denying he is righteous. What does this suggest about how God judges righteousness in fallen people, and how does it push back on the “filthy rags” way of thinking?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests God can genuinely recognize real righteousness in fallen, unregenerate humans (not perfect righteousness, but true integrity), and Satan’s response reinforces that Job’s uprightness wasn’t mere “pretend” righteousness. This challenges the instinct to assume God views every human good work as automatically “obnoxious” or “filthy rags” in the Reformation sense.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot highlights that it is “God Himself” who calls Job “blameless and upright,” and even announces it “to Satan.”
  • He argues if righteousness were only imputed-as-fiction, Satan would have said so (“you and I both know that Job is totally depraved”), but Satan doesn’t.
  • Instead, Satan attacks motives: “Does Job fear God for nothing?” and claims Job serves God for “selfish gain,” not that Job is immoral.
  • Bercot concludes: Job is blameless “not…against a standard of absolute perfection, but in a real way, in the way that God assesses mankind.”
  • He contrasts this with Matthew Henry’s “filthy rags” framing where even the “best…are but as filthy rags fit to be cast to the dunghill.”
Discussion Follow-ups If God can call a fallen man “upright,” what should that do to how we speak about conscience, integrity, and moral responsibility in unbelievers? Where does Scripture still insist we need grace even when real righteousness is present?