Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
Bercot acknowledges some drift between the first, second, and third centuries, but denies major changes in “primary doctrines, ordinances, or moral teachings”; how should Christians distinguish between minor development, changes in terminology or structure, and actual abandonment of the apostolic faith?
Another way to ask: Bercot admits there was some drift in the first three centuries, but not major change in core doctrines, practices, or morals. How can Christians tell the difference between small developments, new wording or structure, and actually leaving the apostolic faith?

Direct Answer

Based on the transcript, Christians should distinguish between changes in emphasis, terminology, or church structure and changes that alter primary doctrines, ordinances, or moral teachings. Bercot allows for minor drift but denies that the early Church abandoned the apostolic faith in its essentials.

Support from Transcript

- He says, “I am not saying that there was no change between the 1st and 2nd centuries.” - He clarifies, “the changes were small” and “not in the areas of the major doctrines, ordinances, or moral teachings.” - Comparing the second and third centuries, he sees “a small measure of drift,” but again “not in the primary doctrines, ordinances, or moral teachings.” - He acknowledges “a few minor theological changes, or at least changes in emphasis.” - He also mentions “changes in theological terminology and in ecclesiastical structure,” plus “more spiritual laxity in the 3rd century.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not provide a complete test for every disputed issue. But it does suggest asking whether a change affects the Church’s core teaching and practice or merely its language, emphasis, or organization.