Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Bible and Early Church History  /  After the Apostles – A.D. 150  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 7
The Waldensians are used as a concrete case: Bercot says they taught the opposite of Luther’s salvation doctrine, opposed war and state entanglement (before later joining the Reformation), yet practiced infant baptism and believed in the Trinity; what does this mixed profile suggest about how early “dissenting” groups actually thought, and how does it confront the modern desire for a neat “package deal” identity?
Another way to ask: What does the Waldensians’ mix of beliefs (some like Luther, some not) tell you about what early “dissenting” groups were really like? How does this challenge the idea that a true group will have a neat, all-or-nothing set of beliefs?

Direct Answer Bercot’s Waldensian example suggests dissenting groups often didn’t match modern denominational “packages”; they could be rigorous about obedience and nonviolence while still holding beliefs (like infant baptism and the Trinity) that certain modern groups would reject. This confronts the desire to find a single historical group that conveniently carries all our current distinctives.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says Waldensians taught “the exact opposite” of Luther/evangelicals on salvation: “we must live by Jesus’s teachings if we’re going to inherit his kingdom.”
  • They were “opposed to war and to Christians being involved in the state” (before later aligning with the Reformers).
  • He notes they later “drop[ped] what they had held to and join[ed] in with the reformers,” partly because they were “tired of being this small persecuted group.”
  • Yet they also “practiced infant baptism,” which Anabaptists opposed and which Witnesses would call “an extreme heresy.”
  • They “believed in the Trinity” and did not hold Witness distinctives like “the 144,000” or denial of the soul.
Discussion Follow-ups Do you expect “true Christians” in history to resemble your full doctrinal checklist? What if God’s people have often shared kingdom ethics while differing on secondary theological distinctives?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Back Questions Next