Skip to content

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 1
Merle describes conservative Mennonite practice as “looking at biblical principles” and then agreeing, “this is how we’re going to express that” in daily life—what does that process assume about what God is like (his will, clarity, and desire to be obeyed), and how does it challenge the way you personally approach decision-making?
Another way to ask: When Mennonites study the Bible and then agree on how to live it out, what does that say about what they believe God is like and what he wants? How is that different from how you usually make decisions?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
Based on the speaker’s teaching, this process assumes God’s will is knowable through Scripture and that God cares about daily obedience, not just beliefs. It challenges decision-making that is mainly private, preference-driven, or detached from a church community’s shared discernment.

Support from Transcript:
  • He says their approach is: “we looked at biblical principles and then we said… this is how we’re going to express that… lived out in our lives.”
  • He highlights “a commitment to biblicism” and to “living out our faith on a daily basis in practical applications.”
  • He frames decisions as seeking God’s pleasure: “we look at what does God want us to do, what will please Him?”
  • He stresses accountability and shared agreement: “we’re accountable to one another and we agree together, this is how we’re going to live out our faith.”
  • He contrasts it with individual choice: “I’m going to do what I want… nobody else should really have anything to say about my life.”
Discussion Follow-ups What decisions in your life do you treat as “between me and God,” where the transcript would push you to invite church input and shared commitments?