Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Anabaptist Perspectives / No, the Early Church Did Not Teach Penal Substitutionary Atonement - David Bercot
Watch Full Video
Question 7
The speaker’s ransom explanation includes the Father “giving Jesus up” while Satan tortures and kills him—“not the Father punished him”; how does locating the agency of the cross primarily in Satan (rather than the Father’s punishment) reshape how you understand God’s wrath, God’s love, and the meaning of “gave himself up for us”?
Another way to ask: If Satan is the main one causing Jesus’ suffering, not the Father punishing him, how does that change how you see God’s wrath and God’s love? How does it change what “he gave himself up for us” means to you?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
According to the speaker, placing the agency of the crucifixion mainly in Satan reframes the cross as God’s rescuing action in a conflict where humanity is under Satan’s power—God “gave Jesus up” to a sacrificial death, but God is not pictured as the one punishing Jesus. This highlights God’s love as deliverance and protection, while still affirming future wrath against the wicked, and it makes “gave himself up” sound like a willing heroic rescue rather than divine retribution.

Support from Transcript:
  • He says early Christians taught ransom: “Jesus gave his life as a ransom to Satan to free mankind from his power over them.”
  • He clarifies agency: “The Father gave Jesus up. Not the Father punished him.”
  • He describes the exchange as they understood it: Satan could “torture me, kill me… but you set free my people.”
  • He summarizes the core difference with PSA: “You believe it’s God, the Father, who put him on the cross… I believe it was Satan who put him there.”
  • He still affirms God’s wrath and judgment: “The wrath of God will be poured out on the wicked and unrepentant.”
Discussion Follow-ups If Satan’s wickedness is foregrounded at the cross, how does that affect your view of the Father’s heart toward sinners? In what ways does it change the tone of preaching—does it sound more like rescue from bondage than payment to satisfy justice?
Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Previous All Questions Next