Discussion Jumpstarter
Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 8
In the Wisconsin book-study story, the group found it easier to protest the Iraq war than to talk to their own relatives joining the military; what does this reveal about the kinds of “activism” that can avoid personal cost, and what costly conversations might obedience require in your own family or friendships?
Another way to ask: Why was it easier for the group to protest the Iraq war than to talk with relatives who were joining the military? What hard, personal conversations might obedience require in your own relationships?
Discussion Jumpstarter
Direct Answer
The transcript suggests some activism is easier because it targets distant structures rather than close relationships; protesting can feel bold while avoiding the personal cost of confronting loved ones. Nathan implies obedience may require harder, more relational discipleship—telling family and friends they are called to a different way.
- Nathan recounts a “pacifist book study… in Wisconsin” discussing the Iraq war and wanting a “non-resistant perspective.”
- He asked if they had talked to “your nephews, your cousins, your sons… or your grandchildren who are joining the military.”
- Their response implied it was “almost more difficult” and “a new thought for them.”
- He contrasts focus: they were “focused on protesting… government structures and policies.”
- He says the harder obedience is personal: telling your nephew, “we’re called to a different calling,” and even, “No, don’t sign up for the military. You can join our church instead.”