Skip to content

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 3
Nathan argues that Romans 13 gives governments “leeway” with the sword, but that this is “not our calling as people in Christ’s kingdom”; how do you understand the relationship between God ordaining government authority and God forbidding kingdom Christians from participating in that authority?
Another way to ask: Nathan says Romans 13 allows governments to use force, but Christians in Christ’s kingdom aren’t called to do that. How can both be true at the same time?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
According to the transcript, God can ordain government authority to punish wrongdoing, yet Christ calls His church to a separate kingdom ethic that refuses participation in killing and instead focuses on repentance, forgiveness, and enemy-love. So government may bear the sword, but the church should not wield it or “cheer” for it.

Support from Transcript:
  • Nathan says “the Bible does give governments… leeway to carry out social justice and retribution,” referencing “Romans 13… the power of the sword.”
  • He clarifies: “these are not church ministers… These are people in the greater society.”
  • He draws the boundary sharply: “that is not our calling as people in Christ’s kingdom… not something we individually could be involved in.”
  • The host parallels this with war: government defense may be in Romans, but “as kingdom Christians, that’s not something we can be a part of… we can’t… cheer for something like that.”
  • Nathan warns that acknowledging government’s right has led some “to then advocate in favor” of capital punishment; he resists that move.
Discussion Follow-ups How do we affirm Romans 13 without becoming advocates for the sword? What does it look like to respect government authority while refusing to participate in its violence?