Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Tetragrammaton

Started by Richard Bassett
December 30, 2025
2 replies
541 views
#1

Many thanks for the previous answers (or at least resources) to my questions here! This next one is a hot topic & one I had studied briefly before. It has come to my attention that neither the Orthodox Bible nor the Western Churches Bible had the “Tetragrammaton”. It was not until around William Tyndale’s time it was put in some versions. The New Testament never uses it.

After some more research on the topic recently my gut is leading me to agree with the early church’s stance here…and to use terms like the Lord or Father or some such. I do not recall this issue being formerly addressed on here (probably for good reason). I think opening this up to a wider discussion could be problematic.

Yet I still wished to know if my gut or the Spirit was leading me well—that there are certain thorny issues surrounding a specific name for God, besides “I AM” which is more an idea than a proper name for the Mighty One. I don’t feel as though God wants to have a name like you or me…when it came time for Christianity to spread they had moved past this…as in Jesus’s several “I AM” statements in John. Am I off base? Many prayers for your New Year!

Replies (2)

#2

My own opinion has been that to use the tetragrammaton or God's name is not wrong for Christians. The Old Testament writers of course used it heavily, so it doesn't seem that it is wrong.

That being said, I do appreciate that most Bibles follow in the tradition of the Septuagint and the early church in not typically using it. I think a lot of people have an unhealthy obsession with it, such as the JWs and some other groups.

Just my two cents.

#3

Thank you for the response Lynn. I have met more groups than just JWs that are a bit obsessed with the name of God and other magic words. The only “magic” is in the heart and faith of the speaker. I spent about a month of meetings at a Kingdom Hall several years ago. Finally one day I asked this fellow, “so isn’t the real meaning of the name of God ‘He that is’. I think I might have even pointed out that JWs own bible translation online mentioned this as a possibility—if my memory serves.

The man agreed with my argument…it was the last time I attended there.

So, yes, there is a course which covered my question here after all! I thought I had gone thru everything here that might cover this topic. I even went thru all the course titles in case a missed something, so as not to waste peoples time. Alas! I was doing a study group for this course on Matthew and so it is going much slower than I study alone. The next week after asking the current question I read the very chapter that aligned closely with my thoughts. Praise God!

I was picking a name for my first baby boy—thank you Lord— which spurred my wondering why the topic of God’s name was never touched on here. I was very astonished after posting this question that the very next time I picked up a book my inclinations were affirmed. I was overjoyed! I have been very busy with our new baby, sorry for the slow responses.

From “Matthew, Volume I, Chapters 1-13: by David Bercot. p187.” When we pray, for God‘s name to be hallowed, we are not talking about a personal name, like Yahweh, or Jehovah, or titles, like Elohim, or Adonai. As Origin explains, “let us understand what the Father’s “name“ is, and then what the “hallowing“ of it means. The name is a summation or designation descriptive of the peculiar character of the thing named.

…But in the case of God, and as much as He is himself ever unchangeable and unutterable, the proper name which even He may be said to bear is ever one (that mentioned in Exodus), “He that is,” or something similar.“

The early Christian writers are unanimous in declaring the same thing – that God has no name, just descriptive appellations. For names apply to created things. Justin Martyr writes, “to the father of all, who is unbegotten, there is no given name. … these words – Father, God, Creator, Lord, and Master – are not names. Rather, they are descriptions derived from his good deeds and functions.“ Mark Meniscus, Felix, writes, “neither must you ask for the name of God. God is his name.

We have need of names only when a multitude of people are to be separated into individuals. … to God, who is alone, the name “God” is the whole.

Join the Conversation

Create a free account or log in to post and reply.

Confirm Delete

Are you sure you want to delete this post? This action cannot be undone.