Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 7
The discussion of mixed nude bathing—and the author’s swimsuit comparison—presses the question of what “modesty” actually means; where do you personally feel the pull to let current norms define what is “revealing,” and how would you explain “godly culture” to someone who insists modesty is purely cultural?
Another way to ask: If modesty is more than just “whatever culture says,” where do you feel tempted to let today’s standards decide what counts as revealing? How would you explain “godly culture” to someone who says modesty is only cultural?

Direct Answer In the transcript, modesty is not merely what a culture tolerates; it is a “godly culture” that aims to cover the body rather than display it, and it avoids casual exposure between men and women. Bercot’s swimsuit example shows how easily Christians redefine “revealing” based on what the conservative community accepts.

Support from Transcript:

  • Roman culture normalized mixed nude bathing; by the second century, “mixed bathing and the nude was customary.”
  • Clement describes private baths where women strip “before spectators as if exposing their bodies for sale,” even before servants.
  • “In sharp contrast,” Christians taught men and women “should not bathe publicly in each other’s presence.”
  • Bercot explicitly contrasts sources: their modesty was “not…a reflection of Roman culture, but of godly culture.”
  • Modern parallel: Americans are embarrassed by underwear but relax in “swimsuits that are no less revealing,” and Christians “generally follow right along with our culture.”
Discussion Follow-ups Bercot models repentance: he once called objectors “prudish,” but rethought it. What current “normal” practices might future Christians view as obvious immodesty, and what makes them hard for us to see now?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Back Questions Next