Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 10
The chapter ends by saying early Christians’ “normal” lifestyle was markedly different and asks what power they had that we lack; based on the examples in this chapter (divorce, abortion, modesty, entertainment, class distinctions, and church order), what practices, beliefs about God, or communal pressures seem to have produced that independence from culture—and what would you have to change to recover it?
Another way to ask: Early Christians lived in ways that looked very different from the norm—why were they able to do that? From topics like divorce, abortion, modesty, entertainment, class, and church life, what beliefs or church pressures helped them resist culture, and what would you need to change to live that way now?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests their “power” was a settled conviction that God’s commands outrank culture, plus a community norm that expected obedience in everyday life, not just correct beliefs. To recover that independence, Bercot implies we must stop equating “conservative” with “godly” and re-examine our habits where culture quietly sets the standard.

Support from Transcript:

  • Across issues, early Christians “didn’t rationalize matters from a human viewpoint” (divorce) but took Jesus’ words seriously.
  • On abortion, they spoke in terms of “murder” and “account to God,” even when Rome called it moral.
  • On modesty and luxury, they emphasized simple, covering clothing and rejected mixed nude bathing—“godly culture” over Roman culture.
  • On entertainment, they rejected theater and arena violence; Bercot admits he let culture (PG-13) set his limits.
  • On class distinctions, they taught radical equality: “we call each other brothers…we believe we are all equal.”
  • On church order, they obeyed apostolic teaching despite Roman religion allowing women priests; heretical sects followed culture more.
Discussion Follow-ups Bercot ends with a question, not a final diagnosis, so we should be careful not to claim more than he does. What communal expectations (teaching, correction, examples worth imitating) would need to change in a local church for this “normal” lifestyle to become normal again?