Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 5
The pagan critic mocks Christians for abstaining from sporting events, public amusements, banquets, and sacred games—and even calls them “wretched” for being poor and suffering; if a thoughtful non-Christian evaluated your life, what evidence would they find that you are “citizens of heaven” rather than simply a more respectable version of the surrounding culture?
Another way to ask: A non-Christian made fun of Christians for skipping popular entertainment and for being poor and suffering. If a thoughtful non-Christian looked at your life, what would make them think you belong to heaven’s kingdom instead of just blending in?

Direct Answer Bercot’s material implies a non-Christian would look for concrete differences—choices about entertainment, money, status, and reactions to suffering—that show your “thoughts are not fixed on the present,” rather than merely church attendance.

Support from Transcript:

  • The pagan critic’s evidence was visible behavior: Christians “abstain from respectable pleasures,” “don’t attend sporting events,” and “have no interest in public amusements.”
  • He also notes they reject social prestige: “Half-naked themselves, they despise honors and purple robes.”
  • He mocks their hardship: “the majority of you are in want… cold… hungry,” yet they don’t abandon their faith.
  • The AD 130 letter describes their identity claim: “They dwell… as sojourners… citizens of heaven.”
  • Bercot contrasts modern life: many Christians live like “conservative non-Christians, except… attend church,” sharing “the same entertainment” and “materialistic pursuits.”
  • He says today Christians aren’t accused of heavenly absorption; instead, they’re accused of “money-hungry and hypocritical.”
Discussion Follow-ups What specific, observable practices (generosity, simplicity, refusal of certain entertainments, calm under loss) would make the “citizens of heaven” claim believable to someone watching?