Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 1

David Bercot limits “early Christians” mainly to 80/90–199 AD and defines “early Christianity” as the worldwide fellowship that maintained communion with each other; how does that tight definition shape what counts as “normal Christianity,” and what kinds of voices or stories does it intentionally exclude?

Another way to ask: Since Bercot defines “early Christians” as 80/90–199 AD and only those churches that stayed in communion, how does that shape what he calls “normal Christianity”? Who or what stories does this leave out on purpose?

Direct Answer Bercot’s tight definition makes “normal Christianity” mean the shared beliefs and practices of the mainstream, connected churches closest to the apostles, rather than every group that claimed the name “Christian.” It intentionally excludes groups the early church identified as heretical and also avoids treating later, more developed theological systems as the standard.

Support from Transcript:

He defines “early Christians” as those “between 80-90 and 199,” with John alive at the start and Irenaeus as an “important human link to the age of the apostles.”
He defines “early Christianity” as “the worldwide community of early Christians who maintain bonds of fellowship and communion with each other.”
He says, “I’m not referring to the beliefs or practices of anyone labeled as a heretic by that church… but only the wheat.”
He will include some later writers (200–313) only “as long as their teachings agree with those who lived in the period immediately after the apostles.”
He treats these writings as a “witness to what the church in general believed and practiced.”

Discussion Follow-ups What might be gained—and what might be missed—by focusing on only the “communion” stream of Christianity? How would this approach affect how we define “historic Christianity” today?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 1 of 10