Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 2
David Bercot says the Anabaptists came close to recovering the early Christian “ethos of the two kingdoms” and insists Christians “cannot serve two masters”; where do you see the strongest tensions today between seeking God’s kingdom first and being “embroiled” in political, military, or commercial pursuits?
Another way to ask: Where do you see the biggest clash today between putting God’s kingdom first and getting pulled into politics, the military, or making money? Why is that tension so strong?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests the strongest tensions come when Christians invest themselves deeply in the power-structures and ambitions of this world—politics, military involvement, and building wealth—while claiming full devotion to Christ. Bercot frames this as a master-level conflict: these pursuits can rival allegiance to Jesus and His kingdom.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says the Anabaptists “came the closest to recapturing the primitive Christian ethos of the two kingdoms.”
  • He states plainly: “Christians cannot serve two masters.”
  • He warns against being “embroiled in the political and military affairs of this world” while thinking we can be “fully committed to Christ.”
  • He adds another pressure point: being “entangled in building commercial empires” while trying to seek God’s kingdom first.
  • He grounds it in Jesus’ kingdom teaching: “His kingdom is not of this world,” and true obedience makes believers “noticeably different.”
Discussion Follow-ups How do we tell when civic involvement or business pursuits cross the line from responsible living into “entanglement” that competes with the kingdom?