Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 1

David Bercot describes apostolic Christianity as a “treasure” protected by four “towering walls”; which of the four (no new revelation/ultra-conservatism, separation from the world, referring questions to apostolic churches, congregational independence) seems most foreign to how your church evaluates truth and change today, and why?

Another way to ask: Bercot says apostolic Christianity was protected by four “walls.” Which wall feels most unlike how your church decides what’s true or what should change today, and why?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, the most “foreign” wall for many modern churches is likely the early church’s ultra-conservative conviction that there was “no new special revelation after the time of the apostles,” so change was automatically treated as suspicious. The transcript portrays that early instinct as a major safeguard that collapsed once the church began believing Christianity could “change for the better.”

Support from Transcript:

Apostolic Christianity was protected by “four towering walls,” including “the firm conviction that there was no new special revelation after the time of the apostles, and an ultra-conservative spirit that equated change with error.”
“In the past, any new doctrine or practice had been automatically rejected by the church.”
After Constantine, “the church began to re-examine their attitude that change was necessarily wrong.”
Example: salaries for leaders had been considered “heretical,” but the church “reconsidered the matter and decided to accept them.”
The church began saying “God had changed the rules,” and even accepted “the possibility of new special revelation.”

Discussion Follow-ups What kinds of “change” does your church default to trusting because it seems effective or popular? What kinds of change does it default to rejecting—and why?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 1 of 10