Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
True Greatness  /  What Would Alexander Campbell Say to the Church Today?  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 10
Near the end, Bercot uses Jesus’ vine-and-branches illustration: if Jesus is pouring His Spirit into someone and there is visible fruit, refusing them as a brother may be Pharisaical; what concrete markers of “fruit” would you look for before extending brotherhood, and how can a group practice that without sliding into either “easy believism + baptism” ecumenism or the harshness of Mr. Independent Baptist?
Another way to ask: Bercot says if someone shows the Spirit’s fruit, refusing them as a brother may be Pharisaical. What signs of real “fruit” would you look for before calling someone a brother or sister, and how can a church do that without becoming either too loose (“easy believism + baptism”) or too harsh like Mr. Independent Baptist?

Direct Answer Bercot points to two main markers: a real confession of Christ as “Savior and Lord,” and “evidence of godly fruit” showing an obedient relationship with Jesus and an “unblemished moral character.” A group can avoid both extremes by requiring obedience and visible Christ-life, while still showing mercy toward “innocent errors” and being slow to condemn.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says: when someone confesses Christ and he sees “evidence of godly fruit,” he acknowledges them as a brother/sister.
  • He ties this to the vine: refusing a true branch is “a wicked thing,” and may be Pharisaical.
  • He adds guardrails: he is “not saying…everyone…who simply confesses Christ” is a brother; there must be “fruit of the Spirit…a living, loving relationship.”
  • Campbell’s baseline includes living “conformably” to the confession and having an “unblemished moral character.”
  • Bercot rejects two distortions: ecumenism that becomes “easy believism…add water baptism,” and the no-mercy harshness of Mr. Independent Baptist.
Discussion Follow-ups In your context, what behaviors show “trampling” Jesus’ commands (and therefore lack of fruit)? At the same time, what kinds of doctrinal or practice differences might be “innocent errors” that should not block brotherhood?

Jumpstarter 10 of 10
Back Questions Done