Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 5
The Cornerstone exposé of Mike Warnock triggered angry letters that appealed to “Christ is preached” and “lift him up rather than condemning”; what assumptions about evangelistic fruit, forgiveness, and “not judging” are driving those reactions, and how do those assumptions collide with Bercot’s insistence that repentance doesn’t mean sweeping fraud “under the rug”?
Another way to ask: Why do some people respond to fraud by saying “at least Christ is preached” or “don’t judge”? How does that clash with the idea that real repentance means admitting wrong and not hiding it?

Direct Answer Those letters assume that perceived evangelistic results and a posture of forgiveness should outweigh exposing deception; Bercot argues that forgiveness is necessary if there is repentance, but honesty requires naming and not hiding purposeful fraud.

Support from Transcript:

  • Critics argued like this: “whether it's preached for the wrong reason or the right reason, nevertheless Christ is preached,” implying fruit cancels the seriousness of falsehood.
  • They framed exposure as “what the secular press does,” and urged “lift him up and pray for him rather than condemning,” equating investigation with sinful judging.
  • One letter used Jesus’ mercy story: “Christ didn't condemn the woman caught in adultery,” suggesting public accountability is inappropriate.
  • Another assumed criticism must be satanic opposition: “Satan will go and make up lies to bring Mike down.”
  • Bercot’s response: “if Mike is truly repentant, we need to forgive him,” but “this doesn't mean we sweep his dishonesty under the rug.”
  • He distinguishes a mistake from intent: “It isn't a matter of someone simply messing up. It's purposeful dishonesty through which Warnock made hundreds of thousands of dollars.”
Discussion Follow-ups How can a church practice forgiveness without protecting lies? What would “biblical steps to resolve it” require when leaders profit from deception?