Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Kingdom that Turned the World Upside Down  /  Chapter 33, The Kingdom Banner Arises Anew  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 2
In Zurich, some of Zwingli’s associates wanted to “restore apostolic Christianity,” but Zwingli refused to move beyond what the city council permitted; what does this reveal about the chapter’s view of the proper relationship between Christ’s authority and civil authority, and where do you see similar “limits” placed on obedience today (even when leaders say they love reform)?
Another way to ask: When Zwingli wouldn’t go past what the city council allowed, what does that show about who should have final authority—Christ or the government? Where do you see similar limits on obedience today, even among leaders who say they want reform?

Direct Answer The transcript presents Christ’s authority as higher than civil authority, and it portrays state control of the church as a direct obstacle to restoring apostolic Christianity. It suggests that when reform is tethered to what government (or institutional power) permits, obedience to Jesus’ Kingdom teachings gets capped.

Support from Transcript:

  • Zwingli’s associates “wanted to restore apostolic Christianity,” but “Zwingli was not willing to go any further with his Reformation than what the city council would allow.”
  • In response, these Kingdom Christians “began meeting in homes by themselves,” implying they saw obedience to Christ as not dependent on state permission.
  • They taught “a holy, disciplined church, not a state church that included everyone who lived within the state.”
  • With Zwingli’s approval, “civil authorities quickly instituted laws” to “eradicate” Anabaptists, including requiring people to report them and executing leaders.
  • Bercot says both Reformers and Catholics wanted society inside a “Constantinian hybrid” and believed without joined church-state “all of society would collapse.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where do modern churches let donors, laws, politics, or reputation decide how far obedience can go? What would “meeting in homes” represent today when institutions resist Kingdom practice?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10
Back Questions Next