Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Kingdom that Turned the World Upside Down  /  Chapter 33, The Kingdom Banner Arises Anew  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 1
The chapter claims that when ordinary Europeans read the Bible “free of the Augustinian influence of the Reformers,” they “frequently came to embrace the Gospel of the Kingdom”; what does that suggest about God’s intention in giving Scripture to the church, and what does it imply about the spiritual danger of letting any respected theological system pre-filter what we are “allowed” to see?
Another way to ask: If people reading the Bible without the Reformers’ Augustinian lens often chose the “Gospel of the Kingdom,” what does that say about why God gave Scripture to the church? What danger is there in letting any trusted theology decide ahead of time what we’re allowed to notice?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, Scripture was given so ordinary believers could encounter Jesus’ Kingdom message directly, not only through experts. The chapter warns that when a powerful theological system “pre-filters” Scripture, it can blind people to the Gospel of the Kingdom and replace it with a different “essence of Christianity.”

Support from Transcript:

  • The Reformation “fueled the printing and distribution of the Bible,” making it affordable so “the average person” could read it.
  • Bercot says that when Europeans read the Bible “free of the Augustinian influence of the Reformers,” they “frequently came to embrace the Gospel of the Kingdom.”
  • He says some of Zwingli’s associates “were not blinded by the influence of Augustine” and “clearly saw the Gospel of the Kingdom in Jesus’ teaching.”
  • He contrasts Reformers who thought “the essence of Christianity itself was theology” with Anabaptists who saw the essence as “relationship.”
  • He notes Reformation and Catholic systems both tended toward “mechanical” religion, implying a system can shape what people think Christianity is.
Discussion Follow-ups What theological “lenses” do we treat as untouchable? How can we read Scripture in a way that lets Jesus’ commands confront us directly?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next